StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Philosophy of Justice in Plato's Republic - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The intention of the present essay is to critically examine the definition of justice in Plato's work "Republic". The essay would argue both the standpoint of Thrasymachus, the one who proposed the discussed ideology, as well as Socrates, who faced it…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
Philosophy of Justice in Platos Republic
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophy of Justice in Plato's Republic"

?In book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus challenges Socrates with a very specific definition of Justice. What is this definition, and how does hedefend it? What analogies do Socrates and Thrasymachus use to support their respective claims? How is Thrasymachus' position finally defeated? With whom do you agree and why? Justice, as all social concepts, can have different aspects. The interpretation of justice within each era has been based on different criteria. In ancient Greece, justice was often related to the balance of power within the society. This phenomenon is reflected in the dialogue between Socrates and Thrasymachus, as the dialogue has been incorporated in book I of Plato’s Republic. The view of Socrates on justice is in opposition with that of Thrasymachus, as revealed through the arguments developed by each of them. The evaluation of these arguments leads to the assumption that Socrates’ thoughts on justice are based on fairness and equality, a fact that ensures justice, in all its aspects. On the other hand, the view of Thrasymachus on justice follows a different direction, being able to result to social conflicts. It is probably for this reason that, at the end, Thrasymachus recognize the value of Socrates’ view on justice and accept his failure in understanding the actual role of individuals within the society, including their role in the promotion of justice. In accordance with Thrasymachus, ‘justice is nothing else but the interest of the most powerful’ (338c Plato’s Republic I). Thrasymachus defends the above definition by developing a series of arguments, as described below. At the first level, Thrasymachus states that the types of polities globally are many. There are countries based on monarchy, others are based on aristocracy and others are based on democracy (338d). In each of these countries, laws are set in accordance with the interests of the most powerful; it is explained, that no matter the type of the polity, the laws imposed on people, i.e. the citizens, are aligned with the interests of those who govern, who are the most powerful within each particular society (338e). This process is followed in all countries, despite their differences in regard to their polity. In this context, in accordance with Thrasymachus, the interests of the most powerful are promoted in each country, no matter the type of this country’s polity. Thus, justice, as based on the laws introduced by the most powerful, serves the interests of the latter; the above phenomenon, as Thrasymachus notes is common in all countries, no matter their polity. In regard to the above argument of Thrasymachus, Socrates notes that governors are also likely to introduce laws, which are in opposition with their interests; citizens are obliged to respect these laws, as also the laws serving the interests of governors (339e). In other words, citizens have to deal with two different types of laws: those that serve the interests of governors and those serving the interests of citizens. From this point of view, the view of Thrasymachus that justice is only the interest of the most powerful is proved to be invalid. In regard to the above, Thrasymachus supports that governors cannot introduce laws that are opposed to their interests. Rather they are expected to always promote their interests, making no mistakes in choosing laws that promote those interests (340d), exactly like those who are experts in a particular science or art. Those experts do not make mistakes, since in this case, they would lost their power, as resulted from their role as experts (340d). In this context, as Thrasymachus notes, a true governor is not expected to make mistakes; therefore he promotes only his interests (341a). Socrates abjures the above argument referring to the example of a doctor, as used previously by Thrasymachus. Socrates notes that a doctor is a therapist; therefore, he has to take care of the health problems of ill people (341c). In the above case, the interests of ill people are above the interest of the doctor, a fact that further supports the view of Socrates that justice does not, necessarily, promotes the interests of most powerful. Thrasymachus further supports his view on justice referring to the position of righteous compared to the unjust. More specifically, Thrasymachus notes that everytime that a conflict is developed in regard to economic transactions the unjust is more likely to be exonerated, than the righteous (343d). Also, if taxes are imposed, those who are wealthier finally contribute less than those who are of low income (343d). In the same context, righteous, if they are governors, they are likely to ignore their own interests and focus on the interests of the public, suffering, often, significant damages (343e). Socrates responds to the above arguments of Thrasymachus referring to the following facts: all public services are delegated to people on the basis of a particular reward (346a). In private sector also, a similar approach is used. A payment is set as a reward for each individual’s work in regard to the particular position. The specific reward is not considered as equal with the science or the art in which the individual is involved, but just a monetary support for covering personal needs (346b). Thrasymachus agrees with the above explanation considering that no science or art is equal, as of its nature, with the amount given as a reward for being engaged to the specific science or art. In this context, the role of a person within the society cannot affect justice, since the role is independent from the money gained from it (346e). Also, in the context of this role, people can be benefited, as in the case of ill persons who are treated by the doctor. Therefore, the job position of a person does not negatively affect justice, since those who are primarily benefited are the people to which the relevant services are offered. Thrasymachus agrees with the thoughts of Socrates in regard to the relation between science/ art and the reward involved (346e) Socrates continues arguing that a wise man is expected to avoid acting against the interests of another wise man, a fact accepted by Thrasymachus (349b); moreover, a wise man would treat the same the unjust man (349b), avoiding causing damages to him or opposing to his interests (349b). In opposition, the unjust man would harm the same a wise man and another unjust man (349b, c), a fact also accepted by Thrasymachus. In other words, it is implied that a wise man is expected to wish to have the characteristics of a wise man, while the unjust wishes to be bad (350b, c). However, this fact comes to an opposition with Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, which is considered as related to wisdom and power. Therefore, justice would be never influenced by unjust people, but only by wise people. At this point, Socrates refers again to the initial description of justice, as given by Thrasymachus. As noted Thrasymachus, justice is related to wisdom and power, the power of the governor (338c). However, according to Socrates, justice is related to piece while the unjustice is related to conflicts (351d); it is also noted that unjustice cannot negatively affect a society, but also a group of people, even the psychology of a specific person, making him incapable of thinking of anything (352a), a fact accepted by Thrasymachus. Therefore, a person that promoted unjustice would never be able to develop a critical way of thinking; rather he would be expected to hate justice (352a), a fact also accepted by Thrasymachus. The above arguments lead to the final assumption in regard to justice; justice can be initiated only when the soul has kept its virtues (353e); a wise man could promote justice while an unjust man could not be able to support justice (353e). This assumption, as proved through the arguments exchanged between Socrates and Thrasymachus, leads to the rejection of the view of Thrasymachus on justice (338c); justice is not the power of the most powerful to promote their interests; it is rather the expression of wisdom and goodness (355b), which are virtues that cannot exist in unjust people; Thrasymachus admits the above fact, recognizing his failure in describing appropriately justice (355c). Works Cited Plato’s Republic, Book I. Daedalus Publishing Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy Essay on Justice Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Philosophy Essay on Justice Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443543-in-book-i-of-plato-s-republic-thrasymachus
(Philosophy Essay on Justice Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Philosophy Essay on Justice Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443543-in-book-i-of-plato-s-republic-thrasymachus.
“Philosophy Essay on Justice Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443543-in-book-i-of-plato-s-republic-thrasymachus.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy of Justice in Plato's Republic

Thrasymachus and Justice in Plato's Political Philosophy

On the other hand, even their most sincere efforts can maintain flaws and mistakes while devising the laws; so these statutes, in the form of advantages and privileges for the stronger, are unable to present the real picture of justice in their nature and scope.... Somehow, Socrates points out contradiction in the very definition of justice Thrasymachus has developed.... Distinguished sophist of ancient Greece Thrasymachus has elucidated the term justice while entering into discussion on the same topic with great philosopher Socrates, which has been elaborated by Socrates' renowned disciple Plato in his republic....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Platos the Republic: Justice

Plato works on the Republic focuses on the idea of justice citing it as a worthwhile course.... hellip; Plato uses two ways to define the essence of justice as serving the interest of different parts of the “soul” and that of the parts of the “state” (Bhandari).... Plato's the republic: Justice Ideally, the appetitive component of the soul is responsible for lusts, demands, cravings, and is easily influenced by other desires.... He defines justice through the appeals of human psychology instead of dealing with perceived behavior....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Justice in Greek Philosophy

plato's republic is to-date considered in respect of western philosophy to be one of the most influential works.... This paper ''justice in Greek Philosophy'' tells that Greek philosophy is a philosophy that many concede has shaped the whole of Western philosophy ever since its inception.... This argument is dismissed by Socrates after proving that strong personalities rarely get to know whatever is in their best interest; this cannot be just since justice in itself is virtuous (Griffin, Boardman & Murray, 2001)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Plato's Republic

The review "plato's republic" portrays the ideal city where individuals must serve society, society, in turn, exists to serve individuals.... Men and women are to have a common way of life all children, unaware of who their biological parents are, will treat each other as brothers and sisters… The Republic is a philosophical treatise concerned primarily with the question of justice and with the living of a just life.... nbsp; The model of the ideal city involves ideas of justice and nature, human relations and labor relations....
11 Pages (2750 words) Book Report/Review

Platos Aristocracy and Tyranny

In the paper “Plato's Aristocracy and Tyranny” the author analyzes an idea of what Plato has constructed in his mind about an “ideal state” in his book “The republic”.... One of the major features of The republic is Plato's political theory of an ideal state which he claimed to be Aristocracy.... 1 In the context of The republic, the ideal state itself Plato called is "aristocracy" (aristos, "best," and krateîn, "to rule"), ruled by the best and the guiding principle of this state is the reason of the philosophers (Ross, 2005)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Platos Understanding of Virtue in the Republic and Virtue in The Meno

Consequently, Plato had his own philosophy of ethics.... Actually, Plato had his own philosophy of ethics.... In order to expose the problem of man's continuous search for knowledge, Question: "Explain how Plato's understanding of virtue in The republic represents a departure from his understanding of virtue in The Meno?... However, in the last paragraph of the first book of Plato's The republic, he attempts primarily to give an answer to the question "what is justice?...
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Just and Unjust Ruler in Plato's Republic

In the paper “Just and Unjust Ruler in plato's republic” the author focuses on the problem of government, which is one of the most complex and controversial issues facing humanity.... From time to time Socrates interferes into a conversation, and the company agrees that there is no reason to discuss the notion of justice without regard to society.... he socio-political philosophy of Plato, his theory of politics, is an integral part of Plato's philosophy....
11 Pages (2750 words) Article

Justice Defined by Plato

Plato has given much prominence to the idea of justice in all his works.... hellip; He worked towards propagating equality and true justice in his famous work “Gorgias”.... According to Plato, the absence of a fair form of justice for all led to the ruin of the Athenian democracy.... Plato's theory of justice encompassed the fact that justice is the only remedy available for curing the evils like individualism and meddlesomeness which destroy the essence and fair practices for society....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us