StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, 1983 - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The study "The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, 1983" focuses on the critical analysis of the intelligence failures that led to the terror attack of marines in Beirut and what actions would have been taken to avoid it. Terrorist attacks are aimed at the general population with the view of causing panic…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, 1983
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, 1983"

The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, October 1983. Introduction: Terrorist attacks are aimed at the general population with the viewof causing panic, fear and death so that the perpetrators may influence governments in their favor. These attacks like others in the domestic sphere may be avoided where the intelligence apparatus is able to identify the targets and culprits before they attack. This paper is aimed at identifying the intelligence failures that led to the terror attack of marines in Beirut and what actions would have been taken to avoid it. The American public just like the media are constantly demanding answers based on the unsatisfactory intelligence received before any terror attack. The foreign policy governing matters of security in the country needs a complete overhaul in order to curb instances of terror attacks within American territory and on American troops on peace keeping missions. Review of the intelligence gathered will also prevent the constant criticism the government gets of intelligence failure every time there is a terror attack. There has to be a strong and distinct relationship between intelligence gathered and foreign policy to prevent future attacks. There have been many instances in the US when the presidents sought to take control of the intelligence guiding security matters. The continuous doubt by the public on the state of foreign policy when it comes to intelligence has allowed policy makers to play an active role in having control over surprise. This lessens the chances of surprise in intelligence failure and at the same time allows policy makers an opportunity to seek ways of sealing the gaps in law to avoid future occurrences. Lowenthal defines intelligence as any information that meets the needs of policy makers, and that has been collected, refined and narrowed to meet those specific needs.1 It is therefore important to identify that information related to intelligence is closely related to policy. The role of intelligence is not meant to be foretelling and predicting, but as Nye puts it, the role of intelligence is aimed at assisting policy makers to think about the future when making decisions.2 In essence therefore intelligence is solely aimed at assisting policy makers to make better decisions about the future and in the process avoid the dangers that are projected by intelligence projections. The terrorist attack on the marine barracks in Beirut occurred mainly due to a failure in the intelligence systems in place and a weak foreign policy. On the 23rd of October 1983, about 241 US military personnel were killed when a truck with 12,000 pounds of TNT crashed into their contingent compound. The contingent was stationed at the Beirut International Airport at the time. In yet another simultaneous attack another truck bomb hit the French MNF headquarters where about 56 soldiers were killed. Before this twin attacks, there had been other attacks in Beirut targeted at US citizens including the car bomb attack on the Beirut US embassy in April where 17 US citizens were killed.3 Investigations on the incident by the Department of Defense Commission concluded that the attack could be equated to an act of war through terrorism. There was a clear lack of human intelligence leading to the complete failure in intelligence leading to the attack. Based on the Commission’s findings, information collected by trained intelligence agents would have been sufficient to prevent the attack. In the past, there was a huge public outcry on invasion of privacy in the collection of intelligence and hence, there was a reduction on the actual use of human intelligence which was a major fail. Out of the Beirut attack however, the Commission in their findings recommended that it was necessary for the Secretary of Defense to embark and rely on an all source intelligence system that included human intelligence. The Commission was also able to uncover incidents of uncoordinated threat assessment when it came to intelligence. It was found that between May and October of the year 1983, there were many warnings of car bombings although none of them materialized into something substantial to be investigated. Out of this loophole in intelligence, the bombing on October 23rd caught everyone unawares as there was no specific intelligence on where the attack would occur, how it would be carried out and when it would happen. Had the intelligence officials concentrated on the warnings issued beforehand then they may have had a hunch of the perpetrators or even a clue of where the attack would be carried out next. It is important to note that the Beirut bombing on the Marine barracks was much larger and more sophisticated than what the intelligence agencies had imagined. According to the reports issued by the FBI Special Agents based in the explosives unit, the explosion was the biggest of its kind that was non-nuclear; he also added that it was equivalent to an explosion caused by 12,000 pounds of TNT.4 The Committee issued a report that clearly identified problems in intelligence that would have prevented the attack were they dealt with appropriately. Although the Marines were able to collect data through intelligence, they were not able to analyze it effectively due to its huge number. They also had problems in analysis as the information they received was generally non-specific and would have little impact when they needed to effectively plan for defensive measures. There was not enough support given to the Marines by the intelligence agencies is assessing and diffusing important information from the data gathered. The fact that the information did not have specific material that would allow intelligence officers an opportunity to act on it was also a problem. The Marines were always aware that they faced the threat of a terrorist attack and expected that the intelligence officials would supply them the relevant information to do so. The element of surprise in attacks paints a negative picture on intelligence agencies and their ability to collect reliable and effective information. This is however not as bad as the problems identified by Handel that intelligence personnel have a hard time convincing policy makers in their governments that the information collected is viable.5 It is difficult to in some cases avoid intelligence failure hence it’s important for intelligence agencies to try and prevent the element of surprise. Kam agrees with Handel, that surprise attacks are difficult to prevent as there were nonspecific indicators showing the attack was imminent anywhere. He however states that, surprise attacks show that it is easy to make mistakes when discerning capabilities.6 Intelligence agencies made efforts to try and prevent this terror attack but the fact that the Marines were not able to synthesize the information easily; there was a laxity in intelligence. The policy makers in the U.S need to ensure that proper legislation is put forward to furnish the Marines with sufficient intelligence that will prevent future attacks on their military bases. The intelligence agencies should also give them sufficient information early enough to make proper arrangements for security operations. Bibliography: Gates, Robert M. An Opportunity Unfulfilled: The Use and Perceptions of Intelligence at the White House. The Washington Quarterly, winter 1989, 35-44. Handel, Michael I. “Surprise and Change in International Politics”. International Security 4, no.4. (Spring 1980): 57-85. Kam, Ephraim. Surprise Attack the Victim’s Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988. Lowenthal, Mark M. The Burdensome Concept of Failure. In Intelligence: Policy and Process. Ed. Alfred C. Mauer, Marion D. Tunstall and James M. Keagle, 43-56. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985. Nye, Joseph S Jr. “Peering into the Future”. Foreign Affairs (July/ August 1994): 82-93. U.S Congress, House. Review of Adequacy of Security Arrangements for Marines in Lebanon And Plans for Improving That Security. Committee on Armed Services, Investigations Subcommittee, November – December 1983. Washington: GPO, 1985. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Using a post-World War II military or terrorist attack of your choice Case Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1645276-using-a-post-world-war-ii-military-or-terrorist-attack-of-your-choice-that-was-associated-with-some-kind-of-intelligence-failure-prepare-a-comprehensive-case-study-identifying-and-assessing-the-analytical-failures-associated-with-the-attack
(Using a Post-World War II Military or Terrorist Attack of Your Choice Case Study)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1645276-using-a-post-world-war-ii-military-or-terrorist-attack-of-your-choice-that-was-associated-with-some-kind-of-intelligence-failure-prepare-a-comprehensive-case-study-identifying-and-assessing-the-analytical-failures-associated-with-the-attack.
“Using a Post-World War II Military or Terrorist Attack of Your Choice Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1645276-using-a-post-world-war-ii-military-or-terrorist-attack-of-your-choice-that-was-associated-with-some-kind-of-intelligence-failure-prepare-a-comprehensive-case-study-identifying-and-assessing-the-analytical-failures-associated-with-the-attack.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Marine Base Attack in Beirut, 1983

Why does the US continue to label Hezbollah as a terrorist organization

Hezbollah is an organization in Lebanon that has been branded as a terrorist organization.... Different governments have different perceptions and because of their perceptions, they act differently.... ... ... ... Why does the US continue to label Hezbollah as a terrorist organization?... Hezbollah is an organization in Lebanon that has been branded as a terrorist organization....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

A History of Hesbulla

n 1982, Israel began to attack PLO strongholds in southern Lebanon, where it remained until 1985.... This paper is an analysis of the origins, historical development, and the ideologies of Hesbulla, a resistance movement organization established in Lebanon that has evolved over the last 25 years into one of Lebanon's major political parties and a controversial group that some countries....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

International Terrorism Q&A

This assignment "International Terrorism Q&A" covers a number of political questions, regarding source analysis about the Middle East, Kurdish conflict, and Al-Qaeda.... ... ... ... Lastly, expect that terrorist organizations would sprout from the least likely places, including for example right-wing Americans who oppose trade with China, or disillusioned immigrants from Asia and Latin America who are already in the country....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment

Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah Terrorist Organizations

Terrorism is the criminal use of strength or violence in opposition to people or assets to threaten or force a government, the civilian populace, or any section in connection with political or societal objectives.... It aims cultural or religious assemblage, administrations,.... ... ... Terrorism that takes place all through the world is known as worldwide terrorism....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Hazard Analysis for Terrorism

tely High (1983 US Embassy bombings in beirut killed about 50 US Embassy staff; 1983 Beirut Airport Bombing killed about 200 US marines; & 2008 US Embassy in beirut bombing, that left several people injured) ... Identify three terrorist groups that pose the greatest risk to the United States, based on data from National Counterterrorism Center and the FBI in the Background Reading....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Hezbollah organization

Essentially, the word ‘Hezbollah' simply means the Party of God, and it appears that its founders had a religious perspective during its formation (Jewish However, various acts of attack by the Lebanese terrorist group have proved it a radical terrorist organization that is intolerant of divergent views....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Hezbollah and its Campaign of Terror against Israel and West

Its political base is deeply entrenched and very effective that certain countries in the West insist that it should not be totally considered as a terrorist organization.... This paper, Hezbollah and its Campaign of Terror against Israel and West, stresses that The Hezbollah, which is principally based in Lebanon, is considered to be one of the largest and most powerful of the politico-military organizations that have been consistently staging attacks....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Hezbollah in Lebanon

It is generally believed that it was the formation of Amal which formed the base on which Hezbollah was established.... This work "Hezbollah in Lebanon" describes the origins and the activities of the organization that has led to it being classified as a terror outfit.... From this work, it is clear that this political organization used violence as the way through which the group could have achieved that objective....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us