StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage" discusses that same-sex marriage has been a hot topic for quite some time now. Both its proponents and opponents are very vocal about their respective points of view. Some headway has been made as regards this issue within specific states in America…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage"

Introduction The paper herein begins by seeking to establish why same sex marriage causes such great division and argument amongst the public in America. Secondly, it will look into the arguments of the proponents of same sex marriage. Thirdly, it will examine the arguments that are fronted by the opponents of same sex marriage and their main points for the opposition. Finally, it will combine the two sides of the arguments and reach a compromise that would have incorporated paradigms from both sides of the divide. Part b Same sex marriage has been a hot topic for quite some time now. Both its proponents and opponents are very vocal about their respective points of view. Some headway has been made as regards this issue within specific states in America. However, the jury is still out on certain contentious issues regarding this matter. These include matters such as; who has the right to define what a marriage is, should a judge decide on such matters, or should this decision be left to the public through a popular vote. Part c In the Newsweek article by Anna Quindlen, the author starts by recognizing the significance of the ruling in Loving v. Virginia which stated that interracial marriages were not illegal as had earlier been ruled. Before this, it was considered a crime to be party to interracial marriage and Mr. Richard Loving and his wife Mildred Jeter were accused of miscegenation (Quindlen, 1). The Supreme Court ruled that marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man and cannot be denied on the basis of race. In this article the author who is a proponent of same sex marriage argues that in most cases the decision against same sex marriage are influenced by the financial factor and in most cases religion is only used as a scapegoat for the rejection of same sex rights(Quindlen, 2). The author argues that by continuing to refuse to legally recognize unions between individuals of the same sex, there are benefits that are being forgone such as the ability of these couples to adopt children and give them a better chance of advancing in life. The author also scoffs the notion that allowing homosexuals to adopt children will distort the image of marriage in the eyes of these children, arguing that heterosexuals have already done this on their own without much help from the gay community (Quindlen, 4). In the second article titled Interracial Marriage: Slippery Slope? By La Shawn Barber, the author argues that the decision in Loving v Virginia was totally justified and cannot be compared to gays demanding for the right to marriage (La Shawn, 1). This is because; it is a limitation of basic civil rights to deny an individual the right to marriage based on race. The whole objective of the particular law in Virginia was to treat African Americans as second class citizens. The writer is of the opinion that being gay is a lifestyle choice unlike choosing the race to which an individual belongs (La Shawn, 2). Therefore, the writer argues that defining marriage based on lifestyle choice would be a grave mistake as it would set a very dangerous precedent. The writer argues that if this is allowed to happen then nothing would stop marriages between different groups of people such as the marriage between 3 people, marriage between close relatives or even marriages between 10 people. In the article The Future of Marriage by The Editors the author is of the opinion that one of the greatest misconceptions that has been successfully floated around by the gay community is that same-sex marriage represents the future. The writer states that this is not true and same sex marriage is no more popular than it was in the nineties. The writer is of the opinion that same sex marriage will never take off in America unless it is forcefully imposed on all by the use of the legal system. The writer also scoffs at the idea that the legalization of same sex marriages will lead to commitment and a reduction in promiscuity among homosexuals (National Review, pg. 1).This is because the author does not consider these things to be important goals for the government In the article titled ‘The Right’s Contempt For Gay Lives’ by the Daily Dish, the argument centers on marriage’s purposes. The writer attacks the position held by the National Review that seemed to insinuate that the rights of gays were less important than the rights of heterosexual couples (The Daily Dish, 1). The writer argues that the concept that marriage is meant to facilitate procreation would mean that heterosexual couples who get married in order to be able to adopt children are misusing the institution of marriage. The same would apply to heterosexual couples that use family planning methods. Because they do not fulfill the requirement of marriage that is procreation, they are misusing the institution, and, therefore, have no business being in such arrangement. The writer tries to show the absurdity and the double standards that are applied in the interpretation of the meaning of marriage when it comes to heterosexuals and homosexuals. When heterosexuals are involved, less emphasis is placed on the procreation part whether the couple is barren and intends to adopt children or whether they have decided not to have children. However, when it involves homosexuals, undue emphasis is placed on the fact that marriage is an institution that facilitates procreation, and, therefore, if individuals in such an arrangement cannot do this, then they should not be allowed to be in such an arrangement (The Daily Dish, 2). Part d In the first article, the writer mainly argues that just like it was absurd for Mr. Loving to be arrested for marrying a black lady; it is similarly absurd to deny marriage to an individual based on their sexual orientation. According to the article, once again the writer argues that religion should not be used to justify decisions. This is because; the Judge that found Mr. Loving guilty of bigotry in the first place claimed that God created human beings of different races for a reason, and therefore, he was doing God’s bidding. In the second article the writer is of the opinion that marriage should not be allowed between same sex couples because this will bring about the need to redefine what marriage entails and this may open up a Pandora’s Box of some sorts. The writer argues that changing the meaning of marriage in order to accommodate homosexuals would lead to the most unlikely of unions and bring about widespread confusion. This is because; it would give a basis for everybody to go to court demanding their rights to marriage that would give rise to the most unholy of unions, even between close relatives. In the third article the author does not care much for gay rights. He is of the opinion that the gay rights movement has reached a point of stagnation. The writer believes the no good will come from the legalization of same sex marriage and that the reasons of increased commitment and reduced promiscuity among homosexuals should not even be considered as they are not important government goals. In the final article, the main bone of contention by the author is the double standards ascribed to same sex couples. In the definition of marriage in light of same sex marriages, a lot of emphasis is placed on the fact that there should be the ability to procreate, while this same emphasis is not placed on heterosexual couples that may have problems conceiving children. In the article, the writer also takes great exception that the rights and welfare of homosexuals are not given the same priority and importance as those of heterosexual couples. From the above articles, it is clear that common ground can only be obtained on light of granting the rights to marry to the gay community. While doing, this one has to weigh both the pros and cons of such an undertaking. From the first article, it emerges that one of the benefits is the fact that it would allow for the adoption of children by such couples. This would mean access to better life for these children who would otherwise have no places of domicile. In the third article, one of the benefits that emerge is the fact that the legalization of gay marriages would facilitate better sexual behavior in the community, reducing the prevalence of specific diseases. This is because; the facilitation of legal marriages would mean that these unions will be governed by specific rules, and, as such, would reduce promiscuity among the gay community. There are also cons associated with such a decision. According to the second article, if gay marriages are allowed by modifying the definition of what marriage entails, then this would result in a very dangerous precedent that would lead to all sorts of problems. Therefore, the common ground on this issue is enabling the gay community to have unions that will be recognized by law and give them certain rights and privileges without having to change the definition of marriage in order to accommodate them. Conclusion The issue of sex marriage will continue to elicit sharp reactions from the public and will continue to divide communities along ideological and religious lines. The most reasonable solution to the problem lies in finding a compromise that will be satisfactory to both sides. This can only be done by addressing the fears that are expressed by both sides and then coming up with a solution that will satisfy their hopes and aspirations. Bibliography La Shawn, Barber. "Interracial Marriage:Slippery Slope." Columnists 1 (2014): 76-78. townhall.com. Web. 14 Mar. 2014. The Daily Dish. "The Rights Contempt For Gay Lives." The Daily Dish 1 (2009): n. pag. www.theatlantic.com. Web. 15 Apr. 2009. Quindlen, Anna. "The Loving Decision." Newsweek 1 (2010): n. pag. The Loving Decision. Web. 13 Mar. 2010. Editors, The. "The Future of Marriage." National Review 1 (2009): n. pag. nationalreview.com. Web. 8 Apr. 2009. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Finding common ground Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/english/1633832-finding-common-ground
(Finding Common Ground Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/english/1633832-finding-common-ground.
“Finding Common Ground Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1633832-finding-common-ground.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage

Same-sex relationships and same-sex families

The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage is one which raises questions about gender identity and the role which one should have in the family.... Cultural Boundaries the concept of same-sex marriages and families is one which is divided and marginalized first because of the cultural implications that are within society.... This essay discusses the concept of being equal and accepted, that is one of the driving laws of the United States Constitution and is now accepted at a global level....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Should gay couples be Able to marry

One of the most questionable issues is related to marriage.... When two males are indulged in the said practice, it is known as gay's marriage whereas when two females are found in the same state of physical relationship, it is called lesbian marriage.... Throughout the paper, here is the several aspects of gay marriage will be discussed briefly including religion, legality, socialism etc.... The religious leaders have recently joint together against gay marriage plans....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Same sex mariage

The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage is a social deviance, because this relationship lies beyond the limits of morality according to some school of thoughts.... Although the common belief is that marriage is a sacred relationship, which involves individuals from opposite genders, the concept of existence of such relationships between the members of the same genders has also started to influence the minds of many critics of same-sex marriages.... “France has become the 14th country to legalise same-sex marriage” (Chrisafis 1)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Same-sex Marriage in the United States

According to several studies and research works, the majority of the citizens of America have opposed The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage.... In the paper 'Same-sex Marriage in the United States,' the author discusses the topic of same-sex marriage, which is highly controversial.... Various religions tend to provide different opinions about the legalizing of same-sex marriage.... One respondent group about this topic is addressing that the legalization of same-sex marriage can be harmful to the society (Nagle 34)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Same-Sex Marriage in the United States

The law of nature, civil rights, human rights and judiciary system are highly involved in this topic of same-sex marriage.... Supreme Court has also legalized the concept of same sex marriage.... Marriage Equality/ same-sex marriage in the United States It is important for children to have married parents.... According to a policy statement, same-sex marriage is a controversial topic but legalizing same-sex marriage would be the right thing to do....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Romance Today: On the Question of Same Sex Marriage

Does this new concept of marriage accommodate The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage?... The increasing complexities of modern life have caused higher demands on modern families, significantly altering traditional family dynamics and relationships and establishing concepts of modern marriage.... At the same time, the continuous search of modern society to satisfy human needs has brought forward compelling ideas, challenging long-held norms, traditions and beliefs regarding acceptable social relationships, specifically marriage – the society's basic social institution....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Assignment 1: Discussion Questions

believe that The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage is a social DISCUSSION QUESTION goes here] [Your goes here] [Due the paper] Same-Sex Marriages Before discussing whether same-sex marriages are morally acceptable or not, let us get a better understanding of what same-sex marriages actually are.... I believe that The Concept of Same-Sex Marriage is a social deviance because this marital relationship lies beyond the concept of morality.... I do not consider same-sex marriages morally acceptable because they give rise to sexual frustration in a society, as well as harm the foundations of the institution of marriage....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Human Rights Campaign

The focus of this paper is on the organization Human Rights Campaign that is working in order to promote equality in the soy.... The organization is targeting to achieve total equality and justice in the community with a special focus on the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender and gay people....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us