StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analyzing the Problem of Freewill - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Analyzing the Problem of Freewill" discusses that determinists and compatibilists try to reach a conclusion on the question of, if our actions had random causes, morally we would not be responsible. Most compatibilists tend to deny the reality of chance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
Analyzing the Problem of Freewill
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analyzing the Problem of Freewill"

Analyzing the Problem of Freewill al affiliation The problem of free will emanate when one tries to merge the component offreedom with the apparent determinism in this world that has causes and effects. In the view of determinists, they fail to recognize the presence of such freedom. Freedom of will, puts us in a position to have another different view or perspective of our actions ready done. Deterministic world has it that everything that happens has roots in the natural or divine laws. They also believe that there is only one possible future (John, James , & Roy, 2008). Generally, we are supposed to be free beings that can determine our future without external influence. Creativity and unpredictability are other two inherent traits that we as human beings should possess. We should not, at any given time, stand in a position to be easily predicted in our actions. Our system as human beings is probabilistic rather than deterministic and therefore our actions should be unpredictable unlike the machines. Taylorism, coined from the key proponent behind scientific management, argued that human beings work like machines but his scientific movement of management didn’t stand for long. Some scholars have tried to explain freedom by using chance or randomness. These scholars can be traced back from the time of ancient Epicureans to the modern quantum mechanical indeterminists. They argued that, a causal chain can be broken by a random event and the end result would be a nullification of determinism and thus pushing further for a greater room for human freedom. Human action’s freedom requires randomness in terms of absolute unpredictability. However, should our action be a direct consequence of an event that is random, responsibility cannot be felt. That would, in other words, be complete indeterminism. However, on a more critical scrutiny, indeterminism seems to be a threat to reason itself, which require causality and certainty to unearth truth, the laws of nature and even knowledge. A great number of philosophers of all ages, tend to commit themselves to one or a number of dogmas of determinism. They tend to refuse any indeterminism or chance at any given time. A group these philosophers came with the notion that there exists one big disaster to reason, which they called indeterminism. To them, they concurred that there was no medium between chance and necessity. Many scientist, strongly believe in science being predicated on causality and predictability. Without this, science would be viewed as the search for causal laws that are impossible and impractical. For these scientists, the laws that govern nature would not qualify to be called so if they were only based on statistics and probability. Ironically, it comes as a contradiction, for some laws of nature are largely statistical and our predictions being made a mere probability, though probabilities have chances of approaching certainty (John, James , & Roy, 2008). Fortunately, for some objects that are large, it is practically unobservable to tell the departure from deterministic laws. A thin line exists here and thus one cannot tell probabilities from certainties. We can therefore clearly show that there is adequate determinism and a rather soft causality. A more recent debate has been sparked on the problem of the free will. The debate uses a taxonomy of positions that to an extent has caused a big deal of confusion. The confusions on a closer view is on the logical bit and at a larger extent linguistic. On a look at the terminology, at the top level, there exists two mutually exclusive positions. These positions are the determinism and indeterminism. In determinism, there are two more positions that conflict here: compatibilism and incompatibilism. Under indeterminism, a scholar by the name Robert Kane points out three positions. These positions are the ones that were taken by the schools of libertarians-non-causal, Agent-causal and event-causal. A question of whether free-will is compatible with determinism is prevalent and a general one. Most of the philosophers answer this question with a yes. They consider themselves compatibilists. They view the libertarians as their opposite and consider them as the incompatibilists. In the physical world, it is also evident that determinism is not true. The physical world has quantum randomness or absolute chance. However, it is worth noting that chance does not necessarily mean events are completely undetermined and uncaused. Moreover, it does not also pose that the direct cause of our actions is chance. Nevertheless, determinists and compatibilists try to reach a conclusion on the question of, if our actions had random causes, morally we would not be responsible. Most compatibilist tend to deny the reality of chance. They posit that, guided by the quantum mechanical indeterminism, something can be found to be wrong. They also argued that chance is unintelligible and therefore there lacks intelligible explanation of their opposers (libertants) free will. Some dismiss free will calling it a mere illusion. Recently, professional philosophers have specialized in the field of free will and moral responsibility. They have come up with more advanced terms such as narrow, broad, semi and hard incompatibilism as well as illusionism. However, a messy situation arises when the incompatibilists stand includes both hard determinists-those who deny free will and those that deny determinism. The broad incompatibilists hold it that free will and moral responsibilities are incompatible with determinism. On the other hand, the narrow incompatibilists think free will is incompatible with determinism. Semi-incompatibilists can be viewed as narrow compatibilists that are agnostic about free will and determinism. They also have it that moral responsibilities and determinism are compatible. Hard incompatibilists have it that free will and moral responsibilities are incompatible with determinism. Those that believe that free will is an illusion are called the illusionists while soft incompatibilists argue that moral responsibility and free will cannot blend with strict determinism. However, they are compatible with adequate determinism. Soft causalist are also called the event-causalists. To them, they accept causality but agree the existence of some unpredictable events that the term as “causal sui” that causes a chain of causes. The event causal theorists of free will have six sophisticated attitudes towards the functions of chance. Firstly, it posits that chance is in existence in the universe. Quantum mechanics is very correct and that indeterminism is true. Secondly, for free will, chance is very important, chance also breaks the causal chain in determinism. Thirdly, our actions are not directly caused by chance and that none of us can be responsible for random actions. Fourthly, alternative possibilities as far as actions and thoughts are concerned are generated by chance. Fifthly, chance that assumes the form of noise, both thermal and quantum, must be always present and finally, in the sixth and last position, chance should be suppressed by adequately determined will when it decides to act. Thinkers have weighed and considered these six aspects of chance, a small number of them have seen it obviously parallel to the biological evolution and natural selection. In this, the microscopic quantum accidents are the causes of variation in the gene pool while the macroscopic natural selection of the fit genes is characterized by their reproductive success. References John, B., James , C. K., & Roy, F. B. (2008). Are we free? Psychology and Free will. . New York: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The problem of free will arises from three initially plausible Essay - 1”, n.d.)
The problem of free will arises from three initially plausible Essay - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686389-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism
(The Problem of Free Will Arises from Three Initially Plausible Essay - 1)
The Problem of Free Will Arises from Three Initially Plausible Essay - 1. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686389-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism.
“The Problem of Free Will Arises from Three Initially Plausible Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686389-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analyzing the Problem of Freewill

The Concept of Free Will

the problem one encounters when handling issues related to philosophy is that unlike physical sciences, philosophical analysis lacks verification through experimental models' which provide consistent, verifiable results leading to the formulation and analysis of particular hypotheses' and laws', which become readily acceptable in scientific circles due to the stark truth of the evidence presented.... A well educated and informed person is fully capable of analyzing, discussing and taking an action in one's life driven either by one's own desire, guided by the societal and community compulsions or within the precincts of feasibility and rationality....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Capitalism and Social Progress the Future of Society in a Global Economy

Pro-Capitalist Views Economists who argue in favor of capitalism generally base their argument in freewill.... The following research paper under the title "Capitalism and Social Progress the Future of Society in a Global Economy" deals with two major economic systems that were in place throughout the world in the 20th century, namely, capitalism and communism....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Binary approach to evil

Traditionally, the inherent qualities of a person are considered when analyzing the behavior.... This includes the freewill, genetic makeup and personality traits.... In the case where there is a culture of violence, the normative assumption is that it is a problem-solving technique.... Influence of environment on ethics Human beings tend to use shortcuts when analyzing information about their environment (Reich 1998, 25-29)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Against gun control

Research and analysis of the subject clearly indicates that people who are in practice of using guns are of the point of view that the use of gun is actually not the real issue rather the problem lies in the attitude of people (Sherfinski).... However if one would closely analyze the overall situation then it is easy to identify that the real issue is not with the access and availability of guns, but rather the main problem is with the people and their peculiar mentality which compels them to harm or kill others....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Bibles Confirmation of Gods Omnipotent

the problem of evil existence while God is all powerful has made many critics dispute the omnipotence of God.... This paper is a philosophy and an argumentative essay that attests a believer perspective on the issue of God is omnipotent.... To analyze the topic, first of all, the author of this essay attempt to seek bible's perspective of the matter....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Alien Discovery and Controversy in Religion

Strange events within our airspace and in other parts of the earth's atmosphere have led to an increase in the discussion on the possibility of extraterrestrial life in space.... The space exploration by different countries has pointed to the possibility of other creations with.... ... ... A number of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) have been identified accidently and purposefully and all these have increased the possibility of new life within the space....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Working with Representatives of Other Countries

This paper outlines the problem of the language barrier, the cultural pattern of behavior, the main features of relationship to other people.... The language barrier problem is amplified a thousand times in the school environment where only 'online' communication is required....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Conceptual Structures and Conceptual Perception

From the paper "Conceptual Structures and Conceptual Perception " it is clear that there are several ways to represent mental models such as images, scripts, sets of related mental models, controlled vocabulary, and sets of assumptions (Senge, 2006).... ... ... ... Mental models are made up of several characteristics....
10 Pages (2500 words) Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us