StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Theory of Knowledge - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
In this essay the author describes why epistemology is derived from two reek words episteme, meaning knowledge or understanding and logos, which means the ‘study of’. The author discusses why epistemology refers to the philosophical branch that is often concerned with the scope and nature of knowledge…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
The Theory of Knowledge
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Theory of Knowledge"

Justification of knowledge Justification of knowledge Introduction Epistemology is derived from two reek words episteme, meaning knowledge or understanding and logos, which means the ‘study of’. Therefore, epistemology refers to the philosophical branch that is often concerned with the scope and nature of knowledge. In other words, it is often referred to as the theory of knowledge. Epistemology often questions the exact composition of knowledge and the process in which people can acquire it, including the degree to which knowledge of any subject can be acquired by people (Comesaña, 2005). Much of the debate relating to epistemology focuses on philosophical analyses on the particular nature of knowledge including its relationship with other connected notions like justification and true belief. Many philosophers have raised question of whether the concept of knowledge needs any king of justification for it to be accepted as being true and reliable. It is important to understand that when it comes to epistemology, knowledge that is discussed is often propositional, also referred to as the “knowledge that.” this kind of knowledge is often separated from the “knowledge how” as well as “acquaintance knowledge.” For instance, it is a well known fact that when you add 2+2=4; however, another kind of knowledge often exist like that of knowing another person of oneself, place or something (Comesaña, 2005). This has made some philosophers to suggest that an important distinction exists between “knowing how,” “knowing that” as well as “acquaintance knowledge.” In all these, epistemology seems to be greatly interested in the second one. In this paper, I have attempted to make an argument of whether knowledge that people have over various subjects can be effectively justified. Justification For a long time, justification has often been regarded as one of the major conditions for knowledge. In this case, the theories that have long been used to deny the reasons for justification have often been dismissed as being mere non-starters. Previously, some philosophers had attempted to make the traditional perspective that justification was indeed an essential and necessary condition in the study and understanding of knowledge. This was contrary to the epistemic externalists that suggested that justification was to be replaced and in its place, a more reliable indication that was quite sensitive or any kind of externalist condition. The initial philosophers explained that the concept of replacement was not needed at all, since it was not very necessary. Soon this views were dismissed is unnecessary and unable to make people understand the essence of knowledge. In this case, knowledge was seen as an important concept that needed to be credibly supported. More recently, some philosophers have tried to suggest some of the purportedly necessary and essential conditions of knowledge. For instance, these philosophers have always pointed to the universal willingness of most individuals attributing knowledge where truth seems absent. In this regard, they argue that the usual idea of knowledge cannot be termed as factive in general. Some empirical research data has been found, which explains that people can willingly attribute knowledge even where dispositional belief or occurrent are missing. Justification of knowledge Initially, philosophers that often gave preference to the aspect of justification of knowledge showed an open attack towards the epistemological dogma, which asserted that knowledge can be a justified and true belief (Fantl & Mcgrath 2009). They explained that the real essence of having to make a justification for ones beliefs did not require being interpreted as an indication that justification was a necessary component of knowledge. Instead, it is argued that justification is simply an essential and important criterion for the knowledge that people need. In this case, by asking for justification, it is possible to determine whether one is a true belief of the particular item or subject matter in discussion. Because of the association that exists between truth and justification, knowing that a person can fail to have a substantive and god reason in believing a certain proposition is often the basis of our understanding how to determine whether his belief can be effectively trusted. In fact, it is important to realize that by knowledge having to be justified; it does not mean that justification has to be termed as an essential constituent of the knowledge itself. Is justification always necessary? Many instances have been given about incidences where knowledge does not necessarily have to be justified for it to be accepted a true belief. In this case, justification does not always have to be called upon in the process of attributing knowledge correctly (Hawthorne 2002). Generally, people are always willing and able to ascribe knowledge especially in instances of extremely weak and missing justifications. This is especially in incidents where justification was merely an implicit component of the knowledge. For this reason, it is necessary that we make a denial of the existence of knowledge. A good example of the above argument is given where a man believes that his boy is actually innocent in a case of crime amidst the tabled evidence against him (Hawthorne 2002). The man bases his belief on the fact that the boy in question is actually his own son. Generally, we can agree that the son is actually innocent in practice irrespective of whether the evidence provides a contrary opinion. Several example shave also been given to illustrate in certain incidences justification of knowledge is not always necessary and mandatory for it to be accepted as true belief by people who purport to argue in its favor. Generally, knowledge is a concept that can be argued in different perspectives provided a substantive standpoint is agreed upon. People need to understand that it may be difficult to explain that a certain aspect is true without giving any evidence in its support. For this reason, justification becomes a necessary condition for truth. However, it should be noted that not all arguments require justification (Hawthorne 2002). Where people can derive an effective understanding from the arguments given in the most effective manner, then they do not need to make such justifications. This indicates that knowledge is a concept that people have to be careful in making assertions of what they hold as factual issues, otherwise they need to be effectively justified. References Comesaña, J., (2005). “Unsafe Knowledge,” Synthese, 146(3): 395–404. Fantl, J. & Mcgrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World, New York: Oxford University Press. Hawthorne, J., (2002). “Deeply Contingent A Priori Knowledge,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2): 247–69 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Argument essay of Epistemology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Argument essay of Epistemology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1672618-argument-essay-of-epistemology
(Argument Essay of Epistemology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Argument Essay of Epistemology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1672618-argument-essay-of-epistemology.
“Argument Essay of Epistemology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1672618-argument-essay-of-epistemology.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Theory of Knowledge

An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge

An author of the essay "An Introduction to The Theory of Knowledge" claims that 'belief' is the extent to which we think is the truth and 'truth' is the extent to which things really are.... hellip; Plato invites us to imagine a group of life-long inhabitants of a prison-cave with no knowledge what so ever of the outside world.... Plato invites us to imagine a group of life-long inhabitants of a prison-cave with no knowledge what so ever of the outside world....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Theory of Knowledge Is Known as Epistemology

Amongst these, one of the most popularly discussed and debated subject is about the ways of… As O Brien frames it “The Theory of Knowledge asks certain very general and very fundamental questions about knowers and knowledge.... The two most Theories of Knowledge – An Insight The study of The Theory of Knowledge is known as Epistemology.... As O Brien frames it “The Theory of Knowledge asks certain very general and very fundamental questions about knowers and knowledge....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Philospohy of Knowledge

… My objective is to establish as to why it is essential to continue the pursuit, and frame a working theory of knowledge and an epistemology which is acceptable logically and looks sound and cohesive.... In conclusion, I will tender examples to improve one's criteria of knowledge in the future.... I will try to define in this paper what knowledge is and its scope.... knowledge acquisition is the right of an individual, but how one does it, is also one's right....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Platos Epistemological Position

The Theory of Knowledge developed by Plato states that all knowledge is innate and could be This theory is actually very crucial in explaining Plato's epistemological position.... One of the philosophers that tried to explain what distinguishes adequate knowledge and inadequate knowledge was… According to Soccio (126), this philosopher believed that he could identify and articulate the difference between opinion and genuine knowledge by developing a theory of knowledge....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Exercis 5

Hallowell helps me understand how The Theory of Knowledge management is applied in construction organizations.... The article emphasized that the best source of knowledge is the people who are involved in the processes being analyzed and improved, and that an effective strategy of managing knowledge is designing systems, policies, and practices that efficiently and effectively capture, store, and share knowledge to users and decision-makers.... The title of the chosen article is “Safety-knowledge Management in American Construction Organizations” from the Journal of Management in Engineering....
1 Pages (250 words) Personal Statement

Theory of Reason and Knowledge

Applying a scientific approach to The Theory of Knowledge ensures that it is also practical in approach because it can be borne out through experimentation and is not purely reliant on abstract elements.... But there are some weaknesses associated with the application of pure reason alone to The Theory of Knowledge.... This theory of knowledge is based upon correlation, i.... The strengths associated with the theory of reason are that knowledge that is derived therefrom tends to be solidly based in facts and has a scientific basis to it....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Doubt is the Key to Knowledge

Epistemology – The Theory of Knowledge also addresses the issue of the contribution of doubt in acquiring knowledge (Tomberlin, 1999).... The Theory of Knowledge concerns with certain questions among them an important one is to find out the motive behind the initiation of the process of attaining knowledge.... The Theory of Knowledge insists upon differentiating knowing that from knowing how.... The Theory of Knowledge links truth, beliefs, and justification....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge

However, The Theory of Knowledge manages to succeed in getting to the top of the list.... The Theory of Knowledge was introduced by a philosopher who was Scottish, by the name of James Frederick Ferrier (1808–1864).... The Theory of Knowledge also manages to create links and establish bridges between other notions such as belief, truth, and justification.... ightly bound with The Theory of Knowledge is the problem of knowledge....
5 Pages (1250 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us