StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers - Report Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers" aims at analyzing the different approaches to organizational design as well as organizational effectiveness in order to evaluate why most managers find rational approaches to organizations and organizing appealing…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers"

Theoretical Analysis of Organisational Design and Effectiveness to Evaluate Why Most Managers Find Rational Approaches to Organisations and Organising Appealing Table of Contents 1.Introduction 3 2.Organisational Design Concepts 3 2.1.The Rational Approach 4 2.2.The Natural Systems Approach 6 2.3.The Open Systems Approach 7 3.Conclusion 9 References 10 1. Introduction Organisational design may be defined as “the deliberate process of configuring structures, processes, reward systems, and people practices to create an effective organisation capable of achieving the business strategy” (Kates & Galbraith, 2007, pp.1). It has also been observed that organisational design aims at aligning individual enthusiasms with the organisational interests and in turn helps individual employees make right decisions on a daily basis. The interrelationship between organisational design and effectiveness has been justified by the fact that “insights from organisation design research can help managers improve organisational efficiency and effectiveness” (Daft, 2009, pp.22). In the light of the concepts mentioned above, this report will aim at analysing the different approaches to organisational design as well as organisational effectiveness in order to evaluate why most managers find rational approaches to organisations and organising appealing. 2. Organisational Design Concepts Corporate strategy is among the important factors that affect organisational design; however, numerous other contingencies such as “environment, size and life-cycle, technology, and organisational culture” are found to be influencing organisational design. In order to manifest effectiveness, an organisation should be “designed to fit the contingency factors” (Daft, 2009, pp.73). This has been depicted in the form of the figure appended below. Figure 1: Contingency Factors that Affect Organisational Design (Source: Daft, 2009, pp.74) Organisational effectiveness is one of the major objectives of organisational design and efficient organisations have a tendency to generate growing amounts of riches to be shared out among employees, management, and the society as opposed to the fact that such organisations are relatively more occupied with their internal functioning in comparison to effective organisations. One of the major challenges faced by organisational evaluation is to find out the most practicable methods for differentiating between ineffective and effective organisations. Hence, managers should design the companies that they lead, taking into consideration the fact that this is predominantly a creative endeavour. 2.1. The Rational Approach It has been said that “by far the predominant view of how decisions ought to be made is the rational approach”, and Mintzberg et al. (1976) have summarised the stages associated with it as recognition, diagnosis, search, design, evaluation, choice, authorisation and implementation (Butler, 1991, pp.43). It has been theorised that “rationality as applied to organisations considered the actions of the organisational members, implementation of goal attainment approaches, and a formalised structure that limited the actions of all members”, and in this context, Scott (2003) has opined that “rational behaviour within organisations takes place within – some analysts would argue, because of clearly specified limits” (Triplett, 2007, pp.3) and has further suggested that resources should be gathered from the organisational environment. This approach used to find extensive application in classical bureaucracies – such as Royal Dutch Shell – that had previously been observed to be controlled on the basis of authority, hierarchy and perceptions of control. Furthermore, these organisations give an excess preference to rational approaches as well as long term strategy formulation (McMillan, n.d., pp.5). The degree of complexity that Shell’s organisational structure used to exhibit prior to the year 1995 can be described by the fact that it was comparable only to the United Nations (UN) and the Roman Catholic Church (Grant, n.d., pp.3). However, it has been observed that the company had realised the necessity for change and transformed their structure from formal (rational) to one that is decentralised (open systems). This shift was justified by the company’s CEO Jeroen van der Veer, who had commented that “we have made good progress on simplification and improving efficiency in recent years, but the competition is not standing still, and neither is Shell” (Shell, 2009). The rational approach comes under the traditional view towards organisations as well as change that assumes the occurrence of variations in the form of a rational method, and tries to “discover, diagnose, design, recommend, and implement solutions to rational problems” (Stanford, 2005, pp.274). It has been reported that “managers rarely make rational decisions of maximising nature and make choices which are of satisfying nature”, and thus, it can be inferred that “once the structures, rules, regulations, policies and procedures are in place, these provide boundaries and guidelines for areas of rational decisions” (Srivastava, 2007, pp.163). 2.2. The Natural Systems Approach It has been said that “business ecology is based on the elegant structure and principles of natural systems” largely because “it recognises that to develop healthy business ecosystems, leaders and their organisations must see themselves, and their environment, through an ecological lens” (Abe, Dempsey & Bassett, 1998, pp.19). It has been theorised that an organisational design environment supported by a relevant organisational model forms the base for a thriving value creation strategy, and it is also believed that “in the new ecological economy, viable, adaptive organisations will adopt such traditional wisdom along with organisational models that emulate natural systems” (Abe, Dempsey & Bassett, 1998, pp.63). In general, the natural systems approach explains the informal characteristics of organisations that are beyond the scope of formal designs and entails a perceptiveness of the wide range of human resource elements as an indispensable component. It has been propounded that organisations should embrace this design perspective in order to deal with their counterparts in the external environment, thereby highlighting the fact that the modern business environment calls for an organisational design that is different from the conventional bureaucratic structure and is significantly dynamic to address the issues arising out of unstable environments. An outstanding example as to how this system may be utilised by companies is the cradle to cradle (C2C) certification that “provides a company with a means to tangibly, credibly measure achievement in environmentally-intelligent design and helps customers purchase and specify products that are pursuing a broader definition of quality” (Global Stewards, n.d.). EcoHangers® Direct has been observed to one of the successful companies that have made optimal use of this model, and it has been found that it “provides completely customized eco-friendly clothes hangers for distribution in national retail chains, licensed merchandise stores, hospitality and tourism locations, government agencies, campuses and college bookstores” (EcoHangers® Direct, 2010). 2.3. The Open Systems Approach This approach ensues from the theory of open systems that may be defined as “a theory of organisation that views organisations not as simple closed bureaucratic structures separate from their surroundings, but as highly complex entities, facing considerable uncertainties in their operations and constantly interacting with their environment” (Burton, DeSanctis & Obel, 2006). It also presupposes that organisational constituents will seek balance between the driving forces that press on them as well as their own reactions to these forces. As shown in the figure appended below, this model consists of four basic elements, viz. an organisation; its environment; interaction among the organisation and its environment; and internal dynamics of the organisation. Figure 2: Basic Elements of the Open System (Source: Coffey, 2009, pp.67) When an organisation is considered as an open system, it provides a holistic overview and emphasises that the developments take place within it as a result of dynamic interactions between the attributes of the system as a whole, the features of the external environment of the system, and the interactions between the system and its environment. An improvisation over the rational approach, “open systems were put forth as a collection of interdependent yet semiautonomous parts that ranged from simple and stable to complex and dynamic” (Triplett, 2007, pp.46) and it has been found during the course of research that this point of view had ensued from an advancement from the naive rational system via the natural system (which is organic) to the multifaceted theories that define the open system. Though flat organisations, by virtue of adopting the open systems approach, have comparatively fewer stages in the organisational hierarchy, put less stress on formal structures, and exhibit loose associations between subunits – that in turn allow for brisk modifications regardless of dynamic as well as unstable environments. It has been reported that although open systems may have regularities, these are inexact as well as transitory, and hence, being different from the conventional bureaucratic structure, they help organisations to thrive successfully in the modern business environment that is increasingly turbulent as well as dynamic. Taking into consideration the fact that organisations using the open systems approach maintain an extensive interface with their external environment, it has been identified that multinational enterprises (MNEs) such as Johnson & Johnson, Procter and Gamble, Coca Cola Co., etc. evaluate the needs of their customers, employees and the community, and simultaneously initiate marketing campaigns targeted specifically to the audiences as well as cultural configurations in different nations (Thomson, 2007, pp.4). 3. Conclusion The open systems approach provides the best possible organisational design that can help the modern corporate to thrive in the globalised business environment. However, the rational system finds an extensive application in bureaucratic organisations that are based on the underlying principles of a well-defined chain of command, authority as well as a strong perception of control and hence, most managers in such organisations find rational approaches appealing. It has been conceptualised that despite being effective for conventional, bureaucratic organisations, the rational approach cannot provide the modern corporate with the much needed competitive edge, and under the present circumstances that is increasingly turbulent as well as dynamic, the open system has been found to have the potential to help organisations prosper as it permits rapid adjustments regardless of dynamic as well as unstable environments. References 1. Abe, M. J., Dempsey, E. P. & Bassett, A. D. 1998. BUSINESS ECOLOGY: GIVING YOUR ORGANIZATION THE NATURAL EDGE. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2. Burton, M. R., DeSanctis, G. & Obel, B. 2006. ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN: A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH. Cambridge University Press. 3. Butler, R. 1991. DESIGNING ORGANIZATIONS: A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE. Taylor & Francis. 4. Coffey, W. G. 2009. A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO LEADERSHIP: HOW TO CREATE SUSTAINED HIGH PERFORMANCE IN A COMPLEX AND UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT. Springer. 5. Daft, L. R. 2009. ORGANIZATION THEORY AND DESIGN. 10th ed. Cengage Learning. 6. EcoHangers® Direct. 2010. ECOHANGERS® DIRECT. [Online]. Available at: http://ecohangersdirect.com/ [Accessed on June 24, 2010]. 7. Global Stewards. No Date. SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FOR GREEN BUSINESSES. Solutions. [Online]. Available at: http://www.globalstewards.org/business.htm [Accessed on June 24, 2010]. 8. Grant, M. R. No Date. ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING WITHIN THE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL GROUP. Case Seven. [Pdf]. Available at: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/grant/docs/07Shell.pdf [Accessed on June 24, 2010]. 9. Kates, A. & Galbraith, R. J. 2007. DESIGNING YOUR ORGANIZATION: USING THE STAR MODEL TO SOLVE 5 CRITICAL DESIGN CHALLENGES. John Wiley and Sons. 10. McMillan, E. No Date. CONSIDERING ORGANISATION STRUCTURE AND DESIGN FROM A COMPLEXITY PARADIGM PERSPECTIVE. [Pdf]. Available at: http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/mcn/pdf_files/part5_5.pdf [Accessed on June 16, 2010]. 11. Shell. May 27, 2009. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC ANNOUNCES NEW SENIOR MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE. News and Media Releases. [Online]. Available at: http://www.shell.com/home/content/media/news_and_library/press_releases/2009/new_management_structure_27052009.html [Accessed on June 24, 2010]. 12. Srivastava, B. 2007. ORGANIZATION DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT: CONCEPTS & APPLICATIONS. Dreamtech Press. 13. Stanford, N. 2005. ORGANIZATION DESIGN: THE COLLABORATIVE APPROACH. Butterworth-Heinemann. 14. Thomson, S. G. September 19, 2007. THE OPEN-SYSTEMS APPROACH IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN. [Pdf]. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=grace_thomson [Accessed on June 24, 2010]. 15. Triplett, J. 2007. ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN: A HOLISTIC VIEW. Collective Erudition Publishing. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4, n.d.)
The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4. https://studentshare.org/management/1567847-assignment
(The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4)
The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4. https://studentshare.org/management/1567847-assignment.
“The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4”. https://studentshare.org/management/1567847-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Evaluation of Organisational Design and Effectiveness of the Managers

Application of DMAIC to Organizational Change

Important Questions Table of Contents Application of DMAIC to Organizational Change 3 FMEA Utilization in Performance Management 4 Types of Organizational Design 8 Hackman and Oldham's Job Descriptive Index (JDI) 10 Assessing Training effectiveness 12 Application of DMAIC to Organizational Change DMAIC model signifies the data-driven enhancement cycle that is utilized for the purpose of stimulating and stabilizing the business processes and designs.... FMEA can be utilized in the process conceptualization and design along with assessment stages....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Importance of Monitoring and Evaluation in Complex Projects

At the outset, projects are required to design and implement plans for M&E as far as the Global Environment Facility (GEF, 2004) Council is concerned.... managers are often confronted with questions and challenges both from inside and outside the organization about projects.... The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfillment of objectives, development, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.... It is intended to identify project design problems and is essentially an internal activity undertaken for project management....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

How to Conduct Employee Evaluations

the evaluation can also help to provide the employee with personal development and organizational goals.... The purpose of this research “How to Conduct Employee Evaluations” is to provide an outline an employee performance evaluation.... The method that was used on this employee evaluation was the measuring of accomplishment.... By conducting this evaluation, employees can be instructed on how to provide better work....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Issues in Employee Performance

Purchasing performance evaluation is “the quantitative or qualitative assessment over a given time towards the achievement of corporate or operational goals and objectives relating to purchasing economics, efficiency and effectiveness” (Lysons, and Farrington, 2006, p634).... managers have long known the truth in the saying ‘‘if you can't measure it, you can't manage… However, there is a growing evidence pointing to the fact that extensive use of performance measurement may have negative effect and may lead to serious ‘dysfunctional behaviour' (Smith, 1993; Austin and Gittel, 2002)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Organizational Development

Since in every organisation there must be a set of problems attached to it, the desire to achieve should be the managers' drive towards achieving Organizational Development.... Discovering the present realities, considering future possibilities, evaluating, and prioritizing alternatives for change should drive the managers desire to choose an OD practitioner (Rothwell et al.... This is because the world is rapidly changing due to technological… For effectiveness, an organization must be able to meet today as well as tomorrow's challenges because adaptability and responsiveness are essential to survive....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Contemporary Management

In order to appear effective and successful, most Organisational managers themselves competitive advantages by scouting for best talents in human resources.... Generally, there are many tools, strategies and formulas available to managers on how they can effectively work with both human and non-human resources to meet strategic goals and achieve Organisational objectives.... Many of the tools available to managers will always present an extensive analysis of a single tool giving it more preference....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Managing Human Capital, Evolution of the Performance Management System

Hence, the performance appraisal process has to be developed in alignment with the organisational strategy and the corporate objectives so that the individual's goals are effectively and strategically determined.... Organisations in today's competitive and dynamic business environment have realised the importance of developing an effective, loyal and competent workforce....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Economics and management Quantity Surveying

The reason behind the inefficiency to provide the exact reason pertaining to effectiveness of leadership in construction industry is the lack of understanding.... managers focus on these aspects before executing the project.... There have been a number of researches pertaining to construction industry, which have highlighted the fact unambiguously that the project managers are the most important success factor of the projects....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us