StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Is There an Enforceable Contract between Taylor and Smith - Essay Example

Summary
From the paper "Is There an Enforceable Contract between Taylor and Smith" it is clear that the doctrine of promissory estoppels binds people who make promises in business or in other matters. The doctrine requires fulfillment of the obligation as made in the representation. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.7% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Is There an Enforceable Contract between Taylor and Smith"

Name Course Lecturer Date Business Law Part 1 Issue Is there an enforceable contract between Taylor and Smith? Rules The doctrine of promissory estoppels binds people who make promises in business or in other matters. The doctrine requires fulfilment of the obligation as made in the representation. According to the High Court in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387, a contractual like obligation arises once a person makes a promise that the other party really believes will be performed1. According to Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988), a promissory estoppel has the following elements2: 1. Legal relationship: There must be a pre-existing or anticipated legal relationship between the two contractual parties. In many cases, the legal relationship in question is contractual. 2. Promise: The defendant must make a representation regarding his future conduct to the other contractual party. Often, the representation takes the form of a promise. 3. Conduct to induce reliance: the defendant must have acted in a way to induce the plaintiff to rely on the promise, and believe the promise will be carried out. 4. Detrimental Reliance: The plaintiff must have suffered loss or harm as a result of relying on the defendant’s representation about his future actions. 5. Unconscionable: It would go against the interests of justice to let the defendant ignore performance of the promise. Application In this case, it is clear than an enforceable promise between Smith and Taylor existed as all the elements of the promissory estoppel are present. The first element is concerned with whether Taylor and Smith had an existing or anticipated legal relationship3. Taylor had been offered a job by Smith at the end of his studies. This fact means that the two parties were due to enter into a contract of employment, and this can be treated as an anticipated legal relationship between the two parties. Thus, the facts of the case easily fulfil the first element of promissory estoppel. The second element of promissory estoppel asks whether the defendant made a promise, or a representation regarding his future conduct towards the plaintiff4. It is clear that a promise was made to Taylor regarding the possibility of getting a Job at Smith’s after finishing his studies. Smith’s recruiter had told Taylor; “You have a position with us next fall provided you successfully complete your law program”. This is a clear and unambiguous promise which creates the impression that Taylor would be guaranteed a job by Smith once he had completed his studies5. The third element examines whether the defendant acted in a way to induce reliance or to encourage the belief the promise will be carried out6. In the case, Smith conduct suggested that they would hire Taylor soon after he completed his studies. Smith sent Taylor a stipend to help him cover the expenses of moving and starting life in Melbourne. This stipend is a clear indication the law firm intended to employ Taylor, and that is why they were assisting him to move and settle in Melbourne. The court will also investigate whether the plaintiff reliance on the promise caused him/her some detriment or loss. In many cases finding out whether the plaintiff suffered harm or loss as a result of reliance on an unperformed promise is a straightforward issue7. In this case, Taylor refused a job offer from another law firm in order to take up Smith’s offer. In addition, he incurred expenses in moving and settling in Melbourne in anticipation of the promised job. Finally, the court will examine the facts to find out if the defendant’s refusal to perform the promise is unconscionable8. In this case, it would not be in the interest of justice for Smith to withdraw their offer of employment once Taylor had incurred the expenses of moving to Melbourne to take up the job offer. In addition, it would be unfair as Taylor has already rejected another job offer in order to be available for the opening promised by Smith. In conclusion, the two parties do not have a binding contract. Instead, Smith made a binding promise to give Taylor a job once he completed his studies. The promise is enforceable under the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel. Defence Lack of consideration Generally, courts will not enforce a promise in the absence of consideration.9 In Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Exch 153, the court considered consideration to be either a benefit or detriment to contractual parties10. In this case, Taylor had not offered any consideration in exchange for the promise of employment. However, the doctrine of promissory estoppels asserts that consideration is not necessary to make a promise binding on the defendant11. Remedies Courts provide equitable remedies to people who have suffered detriment as a result of relying on the promise of the plaintiff12. In this case, the court may order Smith to repay Taylor the expenses incurred in moving and settling in Melbourne. The court may also ask Smith to perform their promise. However, the enforcement of a promise is rare and only occurs when it’s the only way justice can be served. Issue Is the Caravan part of the land? Rules The determination of whether the property of a tenant remains with the landlord at expiry of a lease is made by applying the doctrines of fixtures as set out in Belgrave Nominees v Barlin Scott Air Conditioning (Aust) Pty Ltd (1984) VR 94713. The test for determining whether the Caravan is a Chattel or a fixture involves examining14: 1. The intention of annexation as evident by degree of annexation; 2. The purpose of annexation. Application The intention test involves an objective examination of facts. The test is concerned with the extent of physical attachment (the ease or removal); the nature and relationship of the chattel to the property; whether the user contemplated the chattel to be permanent or temporary; and the relationship of the owner of the chattel to the property owner15. In this case, the degree of physical attachment is small as it’s the caravan’s wheels which have sunk into the land. Although the caravan cannot be carted away, it can be easily dug up and new wheels fixed. The caravan can also be removed with minimum damage to the land. Secondly, the court will have to determine the nature and relationship of the chattel and the estate. The second factor is determined in regard to the nature of the chattel and the common understanding of similar chattels and their relations to realty16. In this case, the caravan is a temporary chattel that is meant to be moved away after sometime. A person would also not expect a caravan to be attached to property at the time of purchase as it is easily removable. The contemplated period of stay on the property is important. It is clear that Jenny intention was to stay on Bob’s piece of land until expiry of her lease. Jenny had parked her Caravan at the beachfront property after leasing the land and had made no move to build a more permanent dwelling on the land. Cases determining whether a property of leased land is a chattel or a fixture focus more on the purpose of annexation since Palumberi v Palumberi NSW ConvR 55 28717. In this case, the purpose of parking the caravan on the land leased from Bob was to provide Jenny with a temporary place to live until expiry of the lease. Palumberi v Palumberi created a guiding test that is concerned with whether the intention was for the chattel to remain on the property temporarily or for an indefinite period of time. In the case, it is clear that Jenny’s intention was for the caravan to remain on the leased land temporarily until the lease had expired. Jenny did not take any action to permanently fix the caravan on the land. Instead, the wheels of the caravan had sunk into the soil slowly over the years. The facts in the case between Bob and Jenny bear close resemblance to those of Belgrave Nominees v Barlin Scott (1984). 18In the 1984 case, the court decided that air conditioning units installed on the plaintiff’s property were part of the real of estate. The court asserted that the air conditioning units were intended to be permanent fixture as they rested on their own weight and were not fixed by bolts. In contrast, the caravan is attached to the land by wheels which have sunk into the earth, but are by no means permanents fixation into the ground. The two cases contrast as most factors in the 1984 case indicate the air conditioning units were fixtures. Conclusion Application of the doctrine of fixture reveals that Bob is wrong in preventing Jenny from removing the caravan. The nature of the caravan, Jenny’s intention in annexing the caravan and the purpose of the caravan indicate it is a chattel and cannot be considered to be part of the land. Bibliography A. Articles/Books/Reports Adams, John Norman, and Roger Brownsword. Understanding contract law. Sweet & Maxwell, 2007. Lindgren, Kevin E., John W. Carter, and David J. Harland. Contract Law in Australia (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011) Treitel, Guenter Heinz. The law of contract (Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) Ziff, Bruce H. Principles of property law (Carswell, 2000) B. Cases Belgrave Nominees v Barlin Scott Air Conditioning (Aust) Pty Ltd (1984) VR 947 Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Exch 153 Palumberi v Palumberi NSW ConvR 55 287 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is There an Enforceable Contract between Taylor and Smith

Business Contracts - Formalities and Capacities

an enforceable contract has the essential elements to form a valid contract but there is some legal defense for its enforcement.... Contracts can also be express-an agreement that is expressed in written or oral words- or implied-in-fact-an agreement between parties that has been inferred from the conduct of the parties.... legal duty arising from that promise: the doctrine here distinguishes between bilateral and unilateral contracts.... A remedy for breach of that duty: in consideration of the development of remedies, a distinction has to be made in English law between common law and equity....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Contract Law Questions

whether there is an employment contract between Abe and his prospective employer and whether there is a contract of sale between Abe and the supplier of the goods.... A contract is a meeting of minds between two or more parties by which one party makes an offer and the other party accepts the offer.... Ltd, the objects of the remuneratory contract, 10 health and safety regulations in the UK that affect the construction industry, 10 health and safety regulations that affect the construction industry....
16 Pages (4000 words) Assignment

USA contract Law

Taylor and Caldwell would have an enforceable contract if they can establish that all the essential elements of their contract are present, which becomes impossible the second the music Hall is burnt down.... Instead, the common law requirements for an enforceable contract will apply.... The essential common law requirements to create an enforceable contract are offer, acceptance and consideration.... Taylor v Caldwell has introduced enormous confusion into the understanding of the nature of contractual liability in that the judgment laid down in the case found the contract between both parties unenforceable and neither party liable to fulfill their end of the agreement....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Equity and Trusts: Proprietary Estoppel

In order to advise Theodore and Christopher with regard to their rights against Tony's estate, it will be necessary to consider their rights under the contract and the legal consequences of the contract being oral.... The objective of the following assignment "Equity and Trusts: Proprietary Estoppel" is to analyze a particular legal case that features estate contracts and the elements of property law....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Main Components of Contract Law

ard in para 31 of Daniel v Drew2 differentiated the two classes of undue influence as: 'In the broadest possible way, the difference between the two classes is that in the case of actual undue influence something has to be done to twist the mind of a donor whereas in cases of presumed undue influence it is more a case of what has not been done namely ensuring that independent advice is available to the donor'Duress is actually a concept in common law whereas undue influence arises in equity....
25 Pages (6250 words) Assignment

Commercial Law and Law of Contract

Nathan a flight instructor at the airfield, called Sir Ross smith airport offers to give Michelle flying lessons.... However, for acceptance to be legally binding between the parties to the contract, it must be communicated by the offeror to the offeree as illustrated in the case of Felthouse v Bindley(No 1) (1862) 138 CLR 1 where an uncle and nephew negotiated over a sale of the nephew's horse (Books Pp 12).... The paper "Commercial Law and Law of contract" highlights that since acceptance is created by mutual agreement, it can only be terminated by mutual agreement as well....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Contract between Jackson and Nu-Shoes Ltd

The paper "contract between Jackson and Nu-Shoes Ltd" is a perfect example of a law case study.... The paper "contract between Jackson and Nu-Shoes Ltd" is a perfect example of a law case study.... The paper "contract between Jackson and Nu-Shoes Ltd" is a perfect example of a law case study.... contract is a legally binding agreement between parties privy to the contract.... The parties' privy to the contract includes Jackson and Nu-Shoes Ltd....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Fundamental Law and Contract Law

The issue is whether taylor and smith formed an enforceable contract and if Taylor is likely to win her lawsuit.... The issue is whether taylor and smith formed an enforceable contract and if Taylor is likely to win her lawsuit.... The issue is whether taylor and smith formed an enforceable contract and if Taylor is likely to win her lawsuit.... Taylor moved to Melbourne two weeks before the exams and the smith provided her with an amount that covered part of her moving cost....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us