StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Capital Punishment - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Capital Punishment" analyzes to what extent should the use of capital punishment be a matter for political and moral choice. The author of the paper presents how capital punishment has undergone a series of drastic transformations in the twentieth century…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful
Capital Punishment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Capital Punishment"

Capital Punishment The capital punishment has undergone a series of drastic transformations in the twentieth century. Till the beginning of the twentieth century, the death penalty was used with decreasing frequency and was restricted, in practice and sometimes in the statutes, to fewer and fewer crimes (Colson 1997). The changes, planned on a grand scale, reflected more than a series of legal decisions. Many of the significant ones in fact took effect without alterations in the penal code, as when states ceased to demand the death penalty for some capital crimes, like sodomy or adultery. Dramatic changes in the letter and the practice of criminal law inevitably indicate that cultural work is being done, that a paradigm shift is occurring in the understanding of crime, criminals, and police power. The main problem is that the debates about capital punishment and its effectiveness are based on ethical principles rather than political or moral rules. Many critics state that capital punishment should be analyzed and discussed in accordance with moral and political principles rather than a 'common sense', values and traditions. Traditionally, the public discussion of crime and punishment encompasses more than the penal code and debates about courts, judges, and juries. The modern criminal justice system emerged at the same time as the fields of psychiatry, criminology, sociology, anthropology, and psychology. These disciplines purported to apply scientific methods of inquiry to behavior, mental illness, and the social and psychological dimensions of crime. In general, moral arguments can be made both for and against capital punishment (Logan, 1999). Long a key element of the debate, moral arguments also have tended to remain fairly static over the years, and often have been used in conjunction with religious arguments. Two moral arguments have remained particularly important throughout the death penalty debate: retribution and the sanctity of life. Those favoring the death penalty often argue that society must express moral outrage at, and condenmation of, heinous crimes such as murder (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). The conscience of society should be educated in the view of such a penalty; if it were not, or when it is not, poor and cheap indeed is the estimate placed upon the sacredness of human life. Conversely, abolitionists often argue that rather than upholding the sanctity of life, the death penalty violates it. Both Henry Fielding and Charles Dickens used moral and political arguments to oppose capital punishment. These same issues have been the subject of even greater attention and controversy in the modern era, as scientific studies have attempted to determine whether capital punishment acts as a deterrent to murder and/or whether it has a "brutalizing" effect on society. In spite of the fact that Fielding supported execution for Bosavern Penlez, he rejected the idea of capital punishment as the only possible measure to prevent crimes (Fielding, 1980). Proponents of capital punishment typically consider deterrence to be one of its fundamental goals. The execution sermons of the early colonies were full of warnings against following in the footsteps of the condemned, and executions were public events designed to instill fear and reverence for the law in the people of the community (Colson 1997). Also, critics admit that such mental state as monomania is an elusive form of insanity manifested itself in a single narrow area. Monomaniacs could thus appear sane and normal most of the time but would become obsessive, wildly irrational, and even homicidal in regard to one particular subject (Coyne & Entzeroth 2006). The rational faculties of the moral imbecile could be entirely intact, but the moral faculties common to normal humans were totally lacking. In court, and in some state penal codes, these new categories sometimes led to an "irresistible impulse" test: For the monomaniacal murderer or the moral imbecile, a single act of explosive violence might expose a lifetime of apparent normalcy as a masquerade (Coyne & Entzeroth 2006). From political standpoint, capital punishment is the effective tool to prevent crime rates and 'threaten' criminals. Thus, Dickens finds that: "The parliamentary returns demonstrate that it is not [effective measure to reduce crimes" (Dickens n.d.). Following Connors (2007) such paradigms views the artist as somehow removed from society and political power, as a seer able to observe and critique society with privileged vision. In political races, too, opponents routinely compete with one another to see who can denounce crime and criminals more vigorously (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). The hyperbolic rhetoric widens the gap between the work of the criminal justice system and the citizens' perception of it. The public forum is increasingly dominated by images of the electric chair, the gas chamber, and the injection table, by the maximum security prison and the hardened convict who, once on parole, only continues his predatory lifestyle (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). Dickens shows that the rhetoric of crime and punishment persuades not only through dehumanization but also by flattering those in power and inspiring their righteous indignation. The representation of execution is a politically loaded act in a wider sense too. As Fielding has argued, spectacular executions may consolidate the power of the state or monarch through public demonstration, but they also run the risk of inciting rebellion (Fielding, 1980). When executions are moved behind closed doors, the meaning of capital punishment in public discourse changes (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). As execution becomes less visible, it comes increasingly to be known secondhand, through representation in journalistic narrative and other forms of public discourse. The move indoors may be explained and justified in the name of common decency, but it also means that public perceptions of capital punishment has changed (Coyne & Entzeroth 2006). "Some people are morally opposed to it; others see it as a corrupting part of our criminal justice system. On the other side are those who argue with fervor that the death penalty is a vital part of any community, a mechanism for people living together to protect innocent life" (Devine 2005, p. 637). It is possible to say that capital punishment is a moral matter when it considers a crime as an individual matter rather than a social one. Capital punishment can be justified if it protects the society and every individual from murders and repeat offenders (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). The constitutional arguments for and against the death penalty are numerous. Those sentenced to death have challenged the constitutionality of their sentences with regard to the prescribed mode of execution, the sentencing procedures used by the court and jury, and the application of the penalty to their particular crime or personal situation. Important as these arguments are, perhaps the most significant arguments in recent years are those that challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty itself, rather than the constitutionality of individual sentences (Coyne & Entzeroth 2006). Dickens admits that: 'But in every branch of this part of the subject--the inefficiency of capital punishment to prevent crime, and its efficiency to produce it--the body of evidence (if there were space to quote or analyse it here) is overpowering and resistless" (Dickens n.d.). Abolitionists claim that although the death penalty was considered an acceptable practice by the framers of the Constitution, in the modern era it constitutes the type of cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. However, retentionists, while not disputing the enormous costs of the modern death penalty, do not see abolition as the answer. Instead, they are seeking ways to reduce the time and costs involved by limiting the number of habeas appeals allowed, and putting strict time limits on them (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). Morality is a good guide for moral choice but critics admit that: "In fact, the moral imperative was so strong that if the state abolished the gallows, citizens would probably take justice into their own hands" (Lifton & Mitchell 2002, p. 36). So, capital punishment should be treated as a political matter only in those cases when it deals with the protective and executive role of the government. Following Rusche and Kirchiemer (2003), a society's political economy requires a strong political force life capital punishment to keep an order and protect citizens from criminals. They state that the criminal justice system as a whole also has an enabling discourse of this kind to justify its actions. In this respect the war on crime resembles military war: the state's efforts are buttressed by texts that dehumanize its enemies while glorifying its standard-bearers. It becomes important to differentiate the "true" criminal from the law-abiding citizen. The capital offender stands at the heart of this discourse as the criminal so dangerous and so irredeemable-so threatening to the social order-that he or she must be destroyed. Society has the responsibility of protecting itself by aggressively policing the line between criminal and normal. Rusche and Kirchiemer (2003) connect labor relations and imprisonment stating that "punishment is the protection of society" (p. xlvii). And, like moral arguments, these arguments tend to remain fairly static over time, perhaps because they are based on people's deep-rooted beliefs and values rather than on empirical research, constitutional law, or practical issues. Indeed, prior to the development of an extensive prison system, execution may have been considered the only sure way to prevent offenders from repeating their crimes. However, when long-term incarceration became a plausible alternative to capital punishment in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, the incapacitation argument began to heat up. Abolitionists typically argue that the death penalty is no longer necessary because life imprisonment will incapacitate equally well. retentionists argue that a "life" sentence does not always mean that a convicted murderer will remain in prison for the rest of his or her life, nor does it prevent convicted murderers from killing again inside the prison walls (Coyne & Entzeroth, 2006). Although historical evidence reveals a long tradition of discriminatory application of the death penalty, and indeed several abolitionists throughout early history noted that the death penalty appeared to be imposed more frequently on the poor and minorities, discrimination did not become a major issue in the capital punishment debate until the second half of the twentieth century (Donohue & Wolfers 2005). It was then that the civil rights movement of the 1960s focused increased public attention and research on the subject. In addition to contending that the death penalty is disproportionately imposed upon the poor and minorities, many abolitionists also claim that juror discretion in death sentencing is likely to produce arbitrary and capricious death sentences a claim that resulted in a successful Eighth Amendment challenge to existing death penalty statutes in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia. However, while new guided discretion statutes enacted since Furman were intended to resolve this problem, many abolitionists argue that death sentences still are being meted out arbitrarily by juries (Connors, 2007). The historical invisibility of the criminal justice system is especially noteworthy, given its conspicuous presence in contemporary culture. "The character of punishments is inextricably associated with and dependent on the cultural values of the state that employs them" (Rusche 7 Kirchiemer 2003, p. xlviii). In political races, too, opponents routinely compete with one another to see who can denounce crime and criminals more vigorously (Lifton & Mitchell, 2002). Capital punishment cannot be seen as an ethical question only because social rules and peace are based on political and moral principles rather than ethical concerns. In sum, capital punishment decisions should be subjected to moral and political choice rather than ethical guidelines because our society is based and functions according to political rules established by the states. In this case, 'political decisions' should ensure well-being of all citizens and protect the society from criminals. Moral rules should be used as a guide based on human morals and values aimed to ensure common good and security. Bibliography 1. Connors, P. G. 2007, Capital Punishment (Current Controversies). Greenhaven Press. 2. Lifton, R. J., Mitchell, G. 2002, Who Owns Death Capital Punishment, the American Conscience, and the End of Executions. Harper Perennial. 3. Colson, Charles W. 1997, The Death Penalty: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. David Bender & Bruno Leone. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press. 4. Coyne, R., Entzeroth, L. 2006, Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process, Third Edition. 5. Devine, R.A. 2005, Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 95, p. 637. 6. Dickens, Ch. The Famous Letters. N.d. Available at :http://home.earthlink.net/bsabatini/Inimitable-Boz/etexts/dickens_on_capital_punishment.html 7. Dickens, Ch. Miscellaneous Papers. 2007. Available at http://www.mastertexts.com/index.phpPageName=ChapterDetails&TitleID=584&VolumeNo=&ChapterNo=4 8. Fielding, H. 1980, A True State of the case of Bosavern Penlez, In Enquiry into the Causes, ed. Zirker, Wesleyan University Press, pp. 55-6. 9. Logan, W.A. 1999, Declaring Life at the Crossroads of Death: Victims' Anti-Death Penalty Views and Prosecutors' Charging Decisions. Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 18, p. 41. 10. Rusche, G., Kircheimer, O. 2003, Punishment and Social Structure. Transaction Publishers; Rev Ed edition. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2132 words, n.d.)
Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2132 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1514369-to-what-extent-should-the-use-of-capital-punishment-be-a-matter-for-political-moral-choice-rather-than-based-simply-on-its-ethnicacy-as-a-deterrent-against-cr
(Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2132 Words)
Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2132 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1514369-to-what-extent-should-the-use-of-capital-punishment-be-a-matter-for-political-moral-choice-rather-than-based-simply-on-its-ethnicacy-as-a-deterrent-against-cr.
“Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2132 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1514369-to-what-extent-should-the-use-of-capital-punishment-be-a-matter-for-political-moral-choice-rather-than-based-simply-on-its-ethnicacy-as-a-deterrent-against-cr.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Capital Punishment

The Cost of Capital Punishment

The aim of the paper “The Cost of Capital Punishment” is to examine Capital Punishment or death penalty, which serves as the severest punishment introduced and imposed by the authorities in order to reprimand the offenders involved into homicide, rape, sodomy or any other heinous crime of grave nature.... rdquo; (Amnesty USA) Consequently, one of the major causes behind Capital Punishment includes the heavy cost spent on the application of death sentence; for the taxpayers have to pay heavy duty for the imposition of the sentence to the offender of a heinous crime....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

Capital Punishment in the USA

This essay “Capital Punishment in the USA” is centered on the argument that theft and fraud are both serious crimes, but they can never be the basis for any type of manslaughter.... The main argument against Capital Punishment states that Capital Punishment disregards the value of human life.... Those against Capital Punishment believe that the value of the criminal's life should not be destroyed by their crime.... The main argument against Capital Punishment states that Capital Punishment disregards the value of human life2....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Capital Punishment should be abolish

Capital Punishment is a lawful way to impose death to redeem the society's desire for justice.... hellip; Amnesty international is the most famous organization which fights for abolition of the Capital Punishment.... Capital Punishment is a lawful way to impose death to redeem the society's desire for justice.... Amnesty international is the most famous organization which fights for abolition of the Capital Punishment.... Capital Punishment is exercised on mentally ill individuals, it also causes emotional suffering for their families and is applied without taking into consideration the convict's case and situation....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Is Capital Punishment Morally Justifiable

hellip; This essay will apply moral reasoning to one of the most disturbing question the society faces nowadays, which is "Is Capital Punishment morally justifiable" In this essay we are going to use the eight stages of moral reasoning developed by Robert Gascoigne. The textbook says that "Moral questions usually involve a range of different issues, which do need to be distinguished from each other in order to be effectively treated.... Thus in this section we will define the exact questions concerning Capital Punishment we are going to discuss, and we will define the reasons for the death penalty we consider to be worth of discussing....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Capital Punishment - Arbitrary by Nature

This essay Capital Punishment - Arbitrary by Nature talks that according to an Associated Press three part series of articles published this past May, the arbitrary nature of imposing the death sentence in the United States today came clearly into focus.... Justice White also focused on the arbitrariness of the application of Capital Punishment, including the appearance of racial bias against black defendants.... It seems incomprehensible that implementation of the ultimate punishment could be administered in a way that is impulsive, unpredictable, or erratic....
6 Pages (1500 words) Dissertation

Capital Punishment in The UK

There is described Capital Punishment in the UK in this research paper.... This paper outlines the history of Capital Punishment in the UK, the evolution of major regulations on its abolishment, ethical aspects of this issue, and arguments against and for its reintroduction.... Today abolition of Capital Punishment is a criterion for any country to join the European Union.... Capital Punishment in the UK has a history dating back to several centuries....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Capital Punishment in Different Countries

hellip; From this paper, it is clear that the terms “Capital Punishment” and “death penalty” get frequently used to imply the same thing.... However, some individuals believe that a difference subsists because the “death penalty” denotes penalty received and not essentially its implementation whereas “Capital Punishment” means the execution itself.... In most places where the practice of Capital Punishment exists, it stays reserved for murder, treason, as part of militia justice or espionage....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

The Reasons of Capital Punishment

"The Reasons of Capital Punishment" paper discusses the issues surrounding the practice.... It is evident that the use of Capital Punishment was practiced in all societies as a means of administering punishments for crimes.... Capital Punishment which is also known as the death penalty has been in existence since early times.... However, in most countries, Capital Punishment has been used to ensure that people do not commit certain crimes....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us