StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

English Legal System, Human Rights Act 1998 - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "English Legal System, Human Rights Act 1998 " discusses that English law protects the negotiations and mutual settlements reached out of ADR from disclosing in any subsequent proceedings. This is the main reason that parties opt for ADR for the settlement of their disputes. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
English Legal System, Human Rights Act 1998
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "English Legal System, Human Rights Act 1998"

ENGLISH LAW Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 has altered the powers of the judiciary as against the legislature and executive Introduction: Human rights are badly affected by the alarming spread of global terrorism threatening the Human Life and Public Property. The security to the life of individual has become a burning problem of global nations. In Europe the Human rights are well protected under the age old European Court of Human Rights which is also known as ECHR. The people of United Kingdom are also protected through this agency. But that was lot of expensive and time consuming. The UK made historic event in the State by enacting the Human Rights Act, 1998 which came into existent from 02.10.2000. The new Act delineated the boundaries of the rights on the principle of democracy. These rights are classified as 1. Right to life 2. Prohibition of torture 3. Prohibition of slavery and forced labour 4. Right to liberty and security 5. Right to a fair trial 6.No punishment without law 7. Right to respect for private and family life 8.Freedom of thought, conscience and religion 9.Freedom of expression 10. Freedom of assembly and association 12.Right to marry 13.Prohibition of discrimination 14.Restrictions on political activity of alien's 15.Prohibition of abuse of rights 16.Limitation on use of restrictions on rights. The new Act has not altered the powers of the judiciary as against the legislature and executive but brought the English law on par with the other nations in the world who recognized and give prominence to the Human rights. By bringing this act into force the English law established that the government is to protect the Human rights of the individuals and there fore brought the actions of public sector, local government and social and health care departments within the ambit of the act. From the date its inception all the statues made are subject to the scrutiny of the Act. That is to say all the Acts and Rules shall comply the provision of the New Act. The human rights enumerated in the new act are not new to any democratic country. These rights are protected either directly or indirectly through some machinery. Similarly prior to this new act the United Kingdom too protecting these rights through European Court of Human Rights, since it is a member of the Council of Europe and the laws of European Court which guarantees the Human rights are binding on United kingdom. The new act brings into its ambit all the central, and local government authorities such as National Health Service, Inland Revenue and police. And the acts of the non-government bodies ranging up to private nursing homes and Telecommunications,. The act does not spare the action of the private individuals impinging the rights more specifically protecting the children, who are subjected to torture from their parents in the process of imposing the discipline. The act maintained the perfect balance by imposing the responsibilities too on the persons to maintain the peace on the principle of one's liberty should not jeopardize the rights of the others. Powers of the court under the act: 1. Power to scrutiny the administrative actions of the public authorities. Under the Act court have been vested with the power to scrutiny the administrative actions and to restrain such authorities from misuse and improper use of their administrative powers when they are violating by acting in contravention of the Human rights enumerated under the act. With this power the court can safeguard the individuals from the inhuman treatment, discrimination, Privacy to property etc. 2. The act does not give absolute powers to the courts. As the law of land which is known as the Constitution of such nation, is supreme in all respect the Act too considered the same and maintained pride of the legislature by not giving over riding powers to the courts in this Act on the enactments made by the legislature. The act allows the public authorities to implement the law made by the Parliament in spite that it is infringing the rights. But keeping the remedy alive at the European Court of Human Rights whose decisions are binding on not only the United Kingdom but also all its members. 3. The Act gives a new power to the court such as power of 'Declaration of Incompatibility'. This power is given to courts to over come the deficiencies in the law made by the legislation that is binding on the citizens. When such law infringes the Human rights, under this power the courts declare such law as Incompatible and advise the legislature to take appropriate action either to amend the law or make alternative remedy. The Human Rights Act 1998 has not given any overriding rights to the courts on the enactments made by the legislation nor on executive functioning within the frame work of the legislation made law. When any authority acts in accordance with the law made by the legislature and such act violates the Human rights, under the new Act the court cannot either restrain or compel the authorities to do or abstain from doing such act. But the court allows the aggrieved to seek justice from European Court of Human rights whose judgment is binding on the English Law. "McLeod V UK" In this case the one couple separated from their legal wedding. In the separation agreement the wife agreed to and over the furniture of her husband. The husband has entered into her house when she was not in the house. She made a complaint with the police to necessary action. She also approached the court of law. The court held that as per the English law the entry of the separated husband into her house in here absence is not illegal but allowed her to seek justice from European court of Human rights. The above mechanism is not only the alternative mechanism to the court but it is guiding organization to the courts in interpreting the laws they play role of recommendatory, and also alternative dispute resolving agencies. The resolution of the dispute by the court is the last resort. The disputes, which could not be resolved with this mechanism are referred to the courts for resolution. The judgment of the court is final and binding on all the citizens and the states too. Role of the Alternative Dispute resolution mechanism As an alternative to the court system. Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism included mediation, arbitration, Ombudsman etc. This mechanism is used as dispute resolving tool. It is functioning as an alternative for the courts, but it is not conclusive remedy since the parties are not bared from approaching the court and seek justice once they approach the ADR. This mechanism will reduce the burden of the courts, which is burdened with numerous important cases, it is also economical, least time consuming, for the parties. Most of disputes can be resolved with the help of mediation. If the dispute is chronic and involving serious question of law and the parties are not satisfied with the ADR mechanism, then the court's interference is inevitable. The State has recognized the Alternative Dispute Resolution system and also encouraging the institution engaged in development of such agencies. From the clients point of view also it is easy and fast settlement system. To make this mechanism most useful and wide use awareness among the users and merchants are to be increased. The client decides which form of ADR is to be opted. If the client is not sure about he seeks assistance from the legal advisors. The clients while preferring the mode of ADR should consider the factors such as the public interest, results of the ADR in similar cases, time taken in resolving, cost, etc. courts may at times ask the parties to opt for ADR as s first remedy. ADR mechanism enables the parties to the dispute to get their dispute resolved before it is put in before the court action. Since even the agreement is reached between the parties it will be enforced only after the court passes an order of agreement. The court time is saved since the passing of agreement order is only formal do not involve trial and other major proceedings. ADR is only an alternative to the courts but it is not pre-requisition for any dispute to come before the court. The court will advise the parties and get them aware about the ADR and its simplified procedure and ask them to opt for ADR instead of court procedure. Court cannot make compulsory to the parties to go for ADR. When ADR is an alternative to courts the services of the Mediation are to linked to the court process. And uniform procedure to be adopted in conducting the cases by the ADR to maintain consistency and quality. Common code, common standard and common disciplinary code for mediators will improve the ADR mechanism. The validity and enforceability of ADR clauses: In ADR the parties come to an understanding and mutually agree to the decision taken in ADR through the mediation. The validity and enforceability of ADR clause depends on the context of the dispute. The legal objection arises for ADR clause in a contract if there is imbalance in bargaining. ADR clause in a contract does not impede the access to justice. The parties are open to seek the justice through a court. ADR agreements arising out of consensual are enforceable. ADR do not prejudice the proceedings of the court. The parties can seek justice from court and participate in ADR simultaneously. Confidentiality: In ADR confidentiality is maintained. The dispute and its caused do not come in to public they will be kept with the knowledge of the parties and the ADR agency. The English law protects the negotiations and mutual settlements reached out of ADR from disclosing in any subsequent proceedings. This is main reason that parties opt for ADR for settlement of their disputes. The consent order passed by the court has legal sanctity and implemented immediately. The features and the functioning of ADR, courts involvement and the government's view of developing the ADR system implies the major and important role being played by the Alternative Dispute Resolving Mechanism in the English legal system. It is indisputable fact that ADR is playing a vital role as an alternative to the court system. Bibliography www.nihrc.org/documents/HR/HR_Impact.doc http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/comp301.htm www.ombuds.org/center/adr2003-7-hornle.html - 43k http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/full-text/parker.htm Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“English Legal System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
English Legal System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1501363-english-legal-system
(English Legal System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
English Legal System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1501363-english-legal-system.
“English Legal System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1501363-english-legal-system.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF English Legal System, Human Rights Act 1998

Human Rights Act 1998

In 1998,Parliament enacted the human rights act,which had expressly given effect to Convention rights.... In 1998,Parliament enacted the human rights act,which had expressly given effect to Convention rights.... Despite the negative reviews that some quarters gave the law, particularly right-leaning groups who think that it impeded the efforts to go after terrorists and politicians who perceived it as fostering the politicisation of the judiciary, the HRA 1998 has a considerable impact on certain aspects of the english legal system....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Scope and Formulation of Family Law Principles - English Legal System

The paper "The Scope and Formulation of Family Law Principles - english legal system" states that the following concepts have been evaluated for the various instances in which family law concepts have changed over time, in keeping with newer legislation demands for equality, justice and fairness.... In this essay, I have attempted to document the simultaneous legal traditions which act as catalysts for bringing in reform discussions within this area of research....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

The European Human Rights Act

a) Do you believe that section 3 of the human rights act 1998 creates a new rule of statutory interpretation for judgesYes, section 3 of the human rights act 1998 does create a new rule of statutory interpretation for judges.... "The human rights act 1998 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received Royal Assent on 9 November 1998, and mostly came into force on 2 October 2000.... The European human rights act was passed in 1998....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998

ur saviour is of course the remedy of Judicial Review through the human rights act 1998 which has become more of an eye sore to the Executive in the yester decades as the Judiciary continues to "check and balance" an unruly, highly political executive through the not so recent human rights act 1998 which seems to have absorbed in the veins of judicial activism and recent case law with much ease.... he promulgation of the human rights act 1998 was one giant step towards the process of judicial review of administrative action in the United Kingdom in the context of its constitutional significance....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Statutory Interpretation

Interpretation of statutes as such, occurs on the basis of rules and principles developed by judges, although the Interpretation act of 1978 does provide some definitions of provisions to facilitate the function.... Statutory interpretation may be addressed both from the legal and non-legal perspectives.... While a legal approach to statutory interpretation may focus upon the kinds of arguments that are likely to succeed in a court of law, approaches from the nonlegal side include philosophical language and constitutional theory since a different objective is sought to be attained....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

A Comparison of the Treatment of Blasphemy in English Law and other Legal Systems

Blasphemy has moved from being a harsh crime of strict liability, based on Old Testament thinking, into an offense that has been struck down by the European Convention on human rights.... However, attempts are made to discuss the manner in which blasphemy is considered in other legal systems.... This dissertation attempts to examine the treatment of blasphemy in English Law and other legal systems of the world.... The emphasis is on attempting to investigate the notion of blasphemy in english law....
32 Pages (8000 words) Dissertation

Business and Employment Laws

it would be treated as direct discrimination and strong punishment for employer would be resulted according to the Sex Discrimination act 1975 Section 1 (Greig v Community Industry (1979); Ministry of Defence v Jeremiah (1980); James v Eastleigh BC (1990)).... The employers who indulged in the direct discrimination of women and involved in their harassment would be strongly punished according to the Sex Discrimination act 1975 Section 4A and Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Social Work for People with Mental Health Problems

This may mean driving the associates to the public aid or WIC office yet also knowing when to encourage and expect the associates to act independently.... ISCUSSIONIn traditional hierarchical organizational models, authority is defined as 'the given right to perform roles: such rights are legitimated by consensual decisions codified in constitutions, contracts, charters, rulings, and other accepted institutional sanctions' (Kahn & Kram, 1994, p.... Yet it has been suggested that when organization members identify themselves with the authority mandated to their roles, they may have the 'legitimate power to pursue their rights, duties, and obligations in the service of their tasks' (Kahn & Kram, 1994, p....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us