StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

How Does Business Hierarchy Affect Communication Strategy - Literature review Example

Summary
The paper  “How Does Business Hierarchy Affect Communication Strategy?”  is a convincing example of a communication literature review. The traditional theory of management states that, generally, communication flows through a path established by a hierarchical (also known as vertical) organizational structure…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "How Does Business Hierarchy Affect Communication Strategy"

HOW DOES BUSINESS HIERARCHY AFFECT COMMUNICATION STRATEGY By (Name) Course title Name of tutor Institution name Department Date of Submission Table of Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 4 Methodology/Procedure 4 Findings 4 Discussion 6 Conclusion 8 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………………………..9 Abstract Traditional theory of management states that, generally, communication flows through a path established by a hierarchical (also known as vertical) organizational structure. However, many organizations have found that this traditional arrangement does not suit their communication goals well. In fact, many organizations are increasingly shifting away from this traditional structure towards more accommodating ones. This paper looks at the influences of the hierarchical structure on the communication strategy a business adopts, making an implicit argument as to why businesses might be changing their organizational structures. Introduction Communication is a key element of business management. It is only through communication that management passes a message of its strategy to the rest of the organization members and a way by which those in the lower ranks can express themselves to their leadership. However, achieving effective communication remains a major challenge for many organizations. This paper argues that business hierarchy influences the effectiveness of communication strategy within the organization. In this regard, this paper focuses on the specific ways in which business hierarchy influences communication strategy. Methodology/Procedure The procedure used towards completing this study involved, first, a review of literature on the impact of business hierarchy as an element of organizational structure on organizational communication strategy. The literature reviewed was varied, including books, journal articles and other sources from various databases on the internet. This review of literature, among other things, helped to reveal some of the variations in defining organizational structures. Findings The reviewed literature facilitated the identification of varied types of organizational structures, as well as the common factors that connect organizational structures to the strategic purpose and goals. According to Daft (2007), there are generally two types of organizational structures: vertical and horizontal. Essentially, vertical structure refers to the hierarchical organization (that is, business hierarchy) where roles and responsibilities are rigidly assigned. In this regard, there is always a rigid protocol to follow in communication. In horizontal structure, communicate flows freely either way. There is not a rigid protocol to follow. These common organizational structure determinants include environment and technology (Scholl 2003; Peguin 2003). According to Peguin (2003), organizational size, strategy and philosophy are factors in structural choice. Vertical and horizontal differentiation, coordination and control mechanisms, as well as formalization and centralization and organizational goals influence organizational structure (Scholl 2003). Generally, organizational structure was found to have significant effect on the organizational effectiveness. Daft (2007), for instance, argues that the designing of organizational structure is dependent on the values and behaviors desired. Moreover, behavior and execution performance have been identified as outcomes of organizational structure (Clemmer 2003). In agreement, Peguin (2003) associates responsiveness to problems, improved abilities, congruous priorities and synthesis of functions and career satisfaction with structural arrangement. Along the same line of argument, Scholl (2003) argues that a poor choice of organizational structure leads to poor relationship with interest groups and diminished innovation capacity. Tiernan et al (2002) examine decentralization and argues that integrative organizational structures offer more advantages over traditional business hierarchies. In this respect, Sablynski (2003) believes that decentralized organizations produce higher job satisfaction levels. Ultimately, though, organizational structure influences the types of communication strategies the organization adopts. These strategies may depend on the types of organization. For example, organizations that are involved in emergencies (such as fire departments) may require quick decision-making. Therefore, hierarchical structure where there is a clear structure of authority and decision-making ultimately rests with one person or a few people at the top may be most appropriate. However, most of the time, organization structural is subject to internal and external political environments (Daft 2007). Discussion Communication serves a very important role in the organization. Focusing purposefully and focusing on results and relationships helps businesses to leverage their communication strategies to attain tangible results with multiple audiences. Generally, the model of strategic communication focuses on four dimensions: situational knowledge; goal setting; communication competence; and anxiety management. The implication here is that communication strategy aims to address not only what is expected, but should also make it possible to anticipate certain events and outcomes and prepare accordingly. In this regard, communication also takes into account how personal values might influence organizational behavior. However, communication strategies, as already noted above, are dependent on the organizational structure. The two types of organizational structures (horizontal and vertical/hierarchical) provide different contexts for these communication strategy components. For instance, organizational structure influences the dimensions of communication climate; that is, the aspects that influence the nature of the environment of communication: support; participation in decision-making; opened and candor; confidence, trust and credibility; and high performance goals. These are related to the key characteristics of competent messages: timeliness, relevance, timeliness and accuracy. According to Spillan et al (2002), shorter chains of command allow messages throughout the organization to move faster movement. But shorter chains of command are attainable in horizontal organizational structures rather than in hierarchies. In relation to the competent message features, for instance, the chain of command influences the speed at which the message is passed from one person to another throughout the organization. In the dynamic world today, speed can make the difference between accuracy and relevance of a message. Hellriegel and Slocum (2004) argue that, in hierarchies, information is distorted and/or lost as the message is passed down the organizational command chain. Organizational structure also influences the effectiveness of communication in the four directions of communication flow in the organization. Upward flow of communication (that is, the passage of information from the lower t the higher ranks of the organization) are aimed to provide managers with appropriate information to help them identify areas of problems, collect data to determine the morale of staff and assess performance, and ultimately make decisions. Upward flow is increasingly important as the organization becomes more complex. This should facilitate participative decision-making. In this regard, it is recommended that organizations should adopt open door policy to facilitate a sound upward flow. But these elements are inconsistent with hierarchical structures. Downward flow involves passing information from the senior members of the organization to the lower ranks. Horizontal flow facilitates the sharing of information among the members of the organization, thereby enhancing teamwork (Spillan et al. 2002; McShane & Von Glinow 2003; Sperry & Whiteman 2003; Hellriegel & Slocum 2004). Managers should have within their reach many options to pick from when designing their communication strategy. But to create these options, the climate should allow the free flow of options. This cannot be in a rigid context where protocol must be obeyed as is the case in hierarchies. Conclusion Ultimately, business hierarchy influences the communication environment: openness and freedom of employees to share information; the involvement of employees in making key decisions; the flow of information (that is, top-down or bottom-up); whether it is result-driven; and whether it is multi-channeled. This is not to say that business hierarchies are entirely ineffective. Indeed, there are cases where hierarchies might be applicable. In emergency rooms, for instance, it is a matter of life and death and quick decision-making is vital. However, that should be understandable in actual emergencies. Otherwise, in overall management, organizational structure should permit the sharing of information. Besides, in such context decisions might make the difference between life and death. However, the goal here was to show how business hierarchy impacts on the communication environment and, ultimately, stifling the management’s freedom and ability to make the appropriate decisions that are sensible in their unique contexts. Bibliography Clemmer, J 2003, Organizational structure limits or liberates high performance. Retrieved http://www.clemmer.net/excerpts/pf_orglimits.html (19 August 2014) Hellriegel, D & Slocum, JW 2004, Organizational behavior, 10th Ed. Mason: South-Western McShane, SL & Von Glinow, MA 2003, Organizational behavior: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution, 2nd Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Peguin, D 2003, Fundamental of organizational structure. Retrieved http://www.up.univ-mrs.fr/-wlaglea/gmba/orgthe/topic2.htm (19 August 2014) Sablynski, CJ 2003, Foundations of organizational structure. Retrieved http://csus.edu/indiv/s/sablynskic/ch14.htm (19 August 2014) Scholl, RW 2003, Organizational Structure. Retrieved http://www.cba.uri.edu/Scholl/Notes/Organizational_Structure.htm (19 August 2014) Sperry, L & Whiteman, A 2003, Communicating effectively and strategically, in L. Sperry (Ed.), Becoming an effective healthcare manager: the essential skills of leadership. Baltimore: Health Professions Press Spillan, JE, Mino, M & Rowles, MS 2002, “Sharing organizational messages through effective lateral communication.” Communication Quarterly, vol.50, no.2 Tiernan, SD, Flood, PC, Murphy, EP & Carroll, SJ 2002, “Employee reactions to flattening organizational structures.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol.11, no.1: pp.47-67 Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF How Does Business Hierarchy Affect Communication Strategy

Formal and Informal Roles Increasing Business Efficiency

Organizational structure is “how the team members and individual work” (Organisational Structure, 2010), and having a structure results in coordinated efforts as it defines “the relationship of reporting, shows the communication channel and identifies how people are linked”.... A study also supports this and states that organization transforming their structure brings about “a change in leadership as the hierarchy and lateral and upward communication brings a transformational change in leadership”....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Autos-Luxus Group Strategic Marketing Plan

Above all, marketing strategy is meant to gain a competitive advantage over competitors in order to enjoy fair dominance.... Further, into the body of the document, various factors including but not limited to market mixes, the relevance of segmentation, targeting, products, pricing, and distribution strategies are discussed in addition to macro/ microelements that affect a business operation.... … The paper “One Autos-Luxus - Mission, hierarchy of Strategies of the Business, Definition of the Industry in Which the Business Will Compete" is an affecting example of a case study on marketing....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Organisational Structure and Performance Management in Manufacturing Organisations in China

The vitality of this variable in businesses and firms led to more varied investigations on the various variables that might affect organisational success both directly and indirectly, and in that respect, researchers such as Connaway & Powell (2010) among others attempted to ascertain how organisational structure might affect or relate with performance management.... The fact that performance management is clearly an important process in any organisation implies that factors that affect this process are also of significance to the organisation and thus, must be focussed on, and such factors include organisational structure....
33 Pages (8250 words)

Building Quality Organisations - Coca-Cola Company

Overall, for an organisation to deliver plans, the structure, as well as the strategy, must be connected together seamlessly (Nakamura, 2003).... The organisational structure in any organisation determines how people communicate in the workplace, the managerial hierarchy, geographical operations and designs a strategic plan for effective organisational growth and development (Ghurman and Aswathappa, 2010).... The organisational structure in any organisation determines how people communicate in the workplace, the managerial hierarchy, geographical operations and designs a strategic plan for effective organisational growth and development (Ghurman and Aswathappa, 2010)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Leadership Has Changed within the Context of a Globalized Environment

Leadership involves creating direction by developing vision and strategy upon a given country or nation.... Leadership involves creating direction by developing vision and strategy upon a given country or nation.... Devine has implemented this leadership approach in order to enhance communication.... His principle is that “One is: No walls, no borders, no hierarchy.... Insureon, a company that offers business insurance to small and startup firms has benefited immensely from effective leadership....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

Hierarchical Organizational Structures

The relationship existing between an organization's structure and its capacity to accomplish its goals in the competitive business climate has in the 21st century come under the spotlight across major organizations globally.... The relationship existing between an organization's structure and its capacity to accomplish its goals in the competitive business climate has in the 21st century come under the spotlight across major organizations globally.... The increasingly changing business context and the competitive business environment have Infact raised questioned as to whether hierarchical organizational structures are still relevant in managing organizations faced with stiff competition....
13 Pages (3250 words) Literature review

Workforce Engagement Has Become a Key Issue for Organisations

The first thing is to ensure proper alignment of efforts with strategy.... Additionally, proper and adequate communication from the manager can improve their engagement as noted by Moorcroft in Subhash and Kopare (2015).... Good communication helps in informing the employees of the goals and objectives of the organization.... Proper communication yields solid results with increased employee engagement (Subhash and Kopare 2015)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Literature review

Bureaucratic Organization: PepsiCo

The main organisational structure of PepsiCo characteristics includes market divisions, global hierarchy and functional corporate offices/groups (PepsiCo, 2016).... The PepsiCo hierarchy structured is influenced by the divergent needs of the organisation including control, monitoring and communications (Mortara and Minshall, 2011).... It also brings into focus the aspect of complexity because the hierarchy defines the roles and responsibilities of different activities within the organisation....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us